Talk:Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe

(Redirected from Talk:Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Yashovardhan Dhanania in topic Requested move 22 May 2017

Requested move 22 May 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved - there was a clear consensus to move. (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the UniverseKavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe – The institute was renamed Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (Kavli IPMU) in 2012 after receiving an endowment from the Kavli Foundation [1], and over the past few years has phased out its previous name Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU). The name IPMU is still sometimes used in Japanese because it is easier to pronounce, but not in English. As of today, the institute's Kavli IPMU name appears on its official website [2], its Japanese government funders - the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [3], and its overseas funders - the Kavli Foundation [4]. KavliIPMUPress (talk) 01:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Secondary sources needed

edit

Expansion of this article will require use of reliable, secondary sources, as the current stub version seems to have been sourced entirely from primary sources. Here are a few possibilities:

Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Connected editor caution

edit