Talk:Institutional discrimination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Institutional discrimination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editI do not personally disagree that the examples cited are discriminating. However, it feels inherently POV to have what is essentially a "list of cases of discrimination"; I suspect that the creator's goal was to voice a protest against the Kentucky decision which Wikipedia is not for. Can it be salvaged and made encyclopedic? With this title I doubt it, but let's try some discussion before I prod it. Henning Makholm 20:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree
editThis page was created rather hap-hazardly. More examples need to be included. They need to refer to ethnic discrimination, and any other types of discrimination that can be thought of.
Complete rewrite or deletion?
editThe article is written poorly and in a negative way. Institutionalized discrimination is also used as a vehicle for female members of the society to have a better chance at getting top positions in politics and company boards. While I think that is negative, for example Dutch society sees this as a way to level the field and bring the female representation to a number closer to 50%.
introduction of social work
editwhat are the group work 203.30.15.249 (talk) 08:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)