Talk:Intelligence
(Redirected from Talk:Intelligence (trait))
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Raffelate in topic Most psychologists...
 | Intelligence was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | ||||||||||||||||
 | This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 500 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Intelligence as seen by other cultures
editThis article needs an addition that describes how other cultures conceive of intelligence
Genes for intelligence
editWhy was what I wrote reverted? 12.110.37.3 (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- For reference, this is the source:
- Deary, Ian (2021). "Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences". Molecular Psychiatry.
Here, we summarise and critique the last 10 years or so of molecular genetic (DNA-based) research on intelligence, including the discovery of genetic loci associated with intelligence
- Deary, Ian (2021). "Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences". Molecular Psychiatry.
- The added content was overly-broad and misrepresented the source, and it wasn't clear why this would belong in the lead of the article. Additionally, saying "already" is editorializing language which misrepresents the study to imply a degree of importance and obviousness which is not supported by the source, and again, wouldn't necessarily belong in the lead even if it were. Grayfell (talk) 04:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- For reference, this is the source:
Most psychologists...
edit"Most psychologists believe that intelligence can be divided into various domains or competencies" in the opening section. As far as I'm aware most psychologists believe intelligence is mostly explained by a single factor. I will remove this pending appropriate sourcing, which I am quite sure does not exist. Raffelate (talk) 12:57, 9 October 2024 (UTC)