Talk:International rankings of South Korea

Learn more about this page

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Developed country#Gallup median household and per-capita income|Median household income]] The anchor (#Gallup median household and per-capita income) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Developed country#Gallup median household and per-capita income|Median per-capita income]] The anchor (#Gallup median household and per-capita income) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Rejecting the deletion by Arthur Rubin

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Arthur Rubin, I added new categories and some important lists of international rankings of South Korea. I don't understand why Arthur Rubin deleted this important list. As following his recommendation, I edited and added Edit summary of this article. I assume you deleted this because of its lackness of edit summary. Thus I did it. Please re-consider the deletion of this article. Thank you. Polk540 (talk) 01:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I proposed deletion of the article. There is no guarantee that the proposal will be accepted. However, if you could explain why the article doesn't violate WP:NOT#STATS, it would be appreciated. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add my vote to deleting the article. Mindless lists and rankings seem to pop up everywhere in Korea-related articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.240.61.2 (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Could you please tell me the reason for deletion? Since I am new user of Wikipedia and user of foreign language as a mother tongue, it is hard to understand the policy. Is it because of its excessive length? Like the other international rankings of particular contry, it has no problem except it length. Thus to avoid its deletion, should someone or I write an explanatory text?

Please see International rankings of the People's Republic of China and International rankings of the United States, then tell me the differences. I appreciate it. Polk540 (talk) 23:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not stats

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The deletion discussion did not reach a consensus. The nominating user mentioned Wikipedia:NOT#STATS, which states that Wikipedia is not an "Excessive listing of statistics. Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader." Thus, I don't think that NOT#STATS applies to this case since it is a list, not a regular prose article. If the nominating user wants some "context" then I'll put in some pretty pictures. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 00:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on International rankings of South Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on International rankings of South Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply