Talk:Internationalist (album)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Yay. Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 09:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Good Article Assessment

Here is the revision of the page I assessed, but I have since made subsequent edits. Below is my assessment.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   (no edit wars etc.)

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Further anaylsis on findings:

• The album image was correctly tagged, used appropriately and a fair-use rationale was applied. Y
• Grammar, prose and spelling is excellent.Y
• Everything is readable, and doesn't incorporate words that a beginning editor or reader wouldn't understand.Y
• It is very good for the excellent work of Dihydrogen Monoxide and Slabba, and avoids POV-style content, something important for an GA nominee.Y
• The article is focused and addresses a broad range of information without going into unnecessary detail. Y

I am therefore willing to pass this article. Well done! — Rudget _speak.work 20:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I can't believe we missed this in the FA

But we had all along that the P2K recording was from the Farewell to the World concert. It was actually from the 25th anniversary/birthday celebration concert in '98. I've corrected it now, but it's amazing that it wasn't picked up sooner. Anyway, now that I've done that, we really ought to seek a reference for it (other than that in the recording itself, they reference it). --lincalinca 13:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

*sheepish grin* - we have a ref though, [1], which I'll add inline to make it a bit more clear. — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 22:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Internationalist (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130111003357/http://www.fiftyfifty.tv/?act=project&cat=musicvideo to http://www.fiftyfifty.tv/?act=project&cat=musicvideo
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070830180212/http://maxtv.com.au/Max/Article.aspx?ID=1282 to http://maxtv.com.au/Max/Article.aspx?id=1282

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internationalist (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071216103040/http://www.hindleysite.com/songs/dayoutcome.htm to http://www.hindleysite.com/songs/dayoutcome.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

FA review

This article is currently orange tagged and has been for a year. The nominator of the FAC is inactive; is anyone able to fix these issues? Anarchyte (talk) 08:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: I see that you noticed this for an FA review. Do you still have these concerns? If so, do you want to bring this to FAR? Z1720 (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@Z1720: I haven't read through the page in much detail myself, but from a brief skim it doesn't seem like the outdated tag warrants any changes. The lead is a bit short, but that's nothing that can't be fixed outside of FAR. Perhaps 100cellsman can shed some light on the tags? Anarchyte (talk) 03:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

I felt its sources didn't live up to current FA standards. I recall trying to look for higher quality ones but barely found anything. 웃OO 03:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

In that case, perhaps a formal FAR is in order just to alleviate any concerns about the article. Anarchyte (talk) 10:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

@100cellsman and Anarchyte: Can one of you bring it to FAR? You will be able to speak to the concerns more effectively than me and, since I often nominate at FAR, I am limited by how many nominations I can bring to the process. If you have any concerns or questions, feel free to ping/message me. Z1720 (talk) 13:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)