Talk:IRC takeover

(Redirected from Talk:Internet Relay Chat takeover)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 21 June 2017

This is all already treated at IRC. Marnanel 04:28, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Rewrite

edit

I've rewritten the article to simplify much of the explanation and make it flow slightly better. æle  2006-05-24t23:42z

some wrong info

edit

An IRC channel takeover is an acquisition of IRC channel operator status by someone other than the channel's owner. It has largely been eliminated due to the increased use of services on IRC networks.

^  in article ^

There ARE other ops usually in a channel. There ARE takeovers with services, like the one shown below on the page. Just getting opped does NOT equal a takeover.

References needed

edit

Too lazy to go digging right now but isn't there some official RFC's we can cite as a reference for this article? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 02:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 June 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition, and seems reasonable. For future reference, when proposing multiple related RMs, it's better to do it as a multi-move, per WP:RM#Requesting multiple page moves.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply



Internet Relay Chat takeoverIRC takeover – Unnecessary expansion of "IRC". See ex. TCP congestion control, IRC Bot. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Necessary article?

edit

IMO this article could be merged into Internet Relay Chat. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply