Talk:Interrogation in the Israel–Hamas war
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interrogation in the Israel–Hamas war article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
Soapbox
editGiven that all this information ultimately comes from the IDF, and given the very pro-Israel slant of this article, this article looks like a WP:SOAPBOX.VR talk 01:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Wonky POV
editDuring the introduction, it is written that "Many news sources, which have analysed the videos, have questioned whether the confessions were extracted under duress.", Except, only AP, Global News (a small Canadian news station, who didn't do it's own investigation) and Amnesty International actually echoed this statement.
- The article doesn't cite any article that supports the claim that "the Associated Press analysed six interrogation videos released by Israel and said the militants may have been speaking under duress". The quoted AP article just says that the prisoners were "speaking quietly but clearly under duress", and the Guardian simply echoes that statement.
- The NBC only said that they might have been under duress.
- The New York Times only echoes the statement of the Gazan Ministry of Health, it had not conducted its own investigation.
Even if those fall under "question", I think the terminology should be changed to "some" rather than "many", which feels to me a loaded word.
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi, good article. Heavy-duty.
scope_creepTalk 20:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)