Talk:Interstate 295 (Delaware–Pennsylvania)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Could be better, no offense but the article reads like a brochure. But it is acceptable nonetheless, I didn't really see anything I needed to change (e.g, typos, wordiness).

   B. MoS compliance:

   Introduction is too short, see WP:LEAD for more info. The intro should be a summary of the entire article.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Large areas of uncited information.

   C. No original research:

   Uncited statements may contain original research.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This one could be improved if it just had a little work done on it. I'm willing to put this one on hold. Article will be placed on hold until issues can be addressed. If an editor does not express interest in addressing these issues within seven days, the article will be delisted. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 02:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I will get around to fixing this article. Dough4872 (talk) 18:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Affirmative. Seven more days. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 22:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I have finished making the requested improvements to the article. Dough4872 (talk) 23:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Seven days? More like seven minutes. Article kept. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 00:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)