This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan Super League, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Pakistan Super LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan Super LeagueTemplate:WikiProject Pakistan Super LeaguePakistan Super League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Whilst doing a search for typos in articles I noticed that this article contains a large portion of text that is identical to a previous version of the subsection 2016 Pakistan Super League from the article for Islamabad United. While this article has some unique content, I am wondering if it would be sensible to merge the two, as this information could also be incorporated into the Islamabad United article, as its own section. I am by no means an expert on this topic (all I know about cricket is that people hit balls with sticks), but to me it seems redundant to have a separate article on this team just for a specific year, when this content is already in the main article. I won't request a merge for this page as I could very well be wrong, but I'll put up a {{Merge to}} template on this article. Thanks! The preceding post was a special message from Her Majesty, the QueenofAwesome06:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply