Talk:Isoquercetin
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Isoquercetin vs isoquercitrin
editI think that the page should be moved from isoquercetin to isoquercitrin, as "isoquercetin" is a misleading name (compare with quercetin and quercitrin), not even mentioned in the Merck index (14th ed.), Isoquercitrin monograph. —Mykhal (talk) 13:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 21 August 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not Moved. No consensus to move is present; according to the Natural Medicine Journal Isoquercetin is also sometimes called isoquercitrin
: this indicates Isoquercetin is probably a more common spelling. L293D (☎ • ✎) 21:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that Isoquercetin be renamed and moved to Isoquercitrin.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links: current log • target log |
Isoquercetin → Isoquercitrin – misleading name, see "Isoquercetin vs isoquercitrin" discussion above Mykhal (talk) 13:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 19:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- According to PubChem the two terms are synonymous and refer to the same substance. According to Natural Medicine Journal
Isoquercetin is also sometimes called isoquercitrin, a nearly identical quercetin-3-monoglucoside. Technically the two are different (isoquercetin has a pyranose ring whereas isoquercitrin has a furanose ring), but functionally the two molecules are indistinguishable.
Not that I trust naturopathy but I hope they have their chemistry right. The article should be edited to reflect that, I don't have idea which term is more common. No such user (talk) 11:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.