Notability in doubt: merge required?

edit

There seems to be doubt over the notability of the individual CDs of Doctor Who spin-off audio plays.

I am wondering if a merge might help, with either one article representing a "season" of CDs or a whole series. Amalgamated the range may be more noteworthy than the individual releases within it.

Jago and Lightfoot may be a case in point, few of the articles are developed beyond a stub, many have no secondary references- this article has been flagged since 2010. The articles could be merged into a single "Jago and Lightfoot" episodes article.

The downside to this proposal is: who would do it. No-one in Wikiproject Doctor Who has been interested enough to claim this article.

But if anyone is reading- do you agree/disagree? Rankersbo (talk) 09:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I entirely agree. I can't see any of, for example, these Jago & Lightfoot articles standing up under general notability requirement. An overall article would seem the best approach. Bondegezou (talk) 14:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
This is a starting point Rankersbo (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
That looks great. I think one article for the whole series would be better still. Bondegezou (talk) 12:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I agree. Better to merge these than risk losing them altogether (and I doubt, given Wikipedia's idiosyncratic approach to notability, that very many BF audios would suvive an AFD) StuartDouglas (talk) 14:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I think the special "Voyage to Venus" and "Voyage to the New World" releases should be slotted in between series 4 and 5 as they are clearly part of the ongoing narrative. Geess2 (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply