Talk:Jaime de Marichalar
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editDo you have a reference that Jaime de Marichalar bears the style and title of His Excellency The Duke of Lugo by virtue of his marriage. On official website of the spanish royal house it makes not mention of this. It states that he wife was created Duchess of Lugo in her own right. The website refers only to him as Don Jaime de Marichalar.
Not 'former husband'
editDon Jaime de Marichalar is still married to the Infanta. He is not her 'former husband'! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boerenfox (talk • contribs) 07:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 06:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Jaime de Marichalar, Duke of Lugo → Jaime de Marichalar — He got divorced and lost the ducal title. --Buho09 (talk) 18:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Spanish titles are shared by husbands jure uxoris during marriage and widowhood, but not otherwise. The Spanish Royal Family and media have stopped calling him by the masculine form of his ex-wife's noble title; so should we. FactStraight (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- I actually just requested this as non-controversial by citing that fact. Should I remove that one? Seven Letters 18:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.