Talk:James Mitchell (writer)

(Redirected from Talk:James Munro (British author))
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

DAAPG 15:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)== NPOV ==Reply

Untitled

edit

Quote="...were tough-minded, well-written, and well-plotted. They had a genuinely heroic (and intelligent) protagonist, an eccentric M-type boss, and menacing villains."

It sounds to me as if this is a little biased. Well-written? Well-plotted? Sounds more like a critics review, which this is not the place for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooseberry (talkcontribs) 04:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Having just re-read all four Munro thrillers, I agree with the article's anonymous author that they are "well-written" and "well-plotted". My only disagreement is with the description of Loomis, Department K's boss, as resembling M. M is a cold fish of course. What spy chief isn't? But Loomis is downright nasty.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Mitchell (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply