Talk:James Reynolds (journalist)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Controversy
editI wonder whether this needs re-writing. While the Youtube contributor has clearly unearthed coverage from a Chinese media source which did cover the disruption to the flame through London, we need to be very careful to establish the date when it was broadcast against the date of Reynold's BBC report. Also, is the CCTV which is shown outside China, the same CCTV which is shown to those inside the country? Reynold's theme was that China was misleading its own people, not those outside it. Furthermore, Reynolds is a reporter. Ultimate responsibility for any bias rests with the editorial team. I am not saying that this is not an important story. On the face of it, Reynold's report was one sided and misleading. But I wonder whether the entry is entirely encyclopaedic. Informed Owl (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Informed Owl
- Absolutely; fortunately that section has now been removed. We also of course need to be careful of citing a homemade YT video as a verifiable source, as it can obviously not answer your legitimate questions. And frankly, considering the number of times the CCP (yes, the first C does indeed stand for Communist, the 3-time-editor who added that didn't need to include it in quotes) has been proved to have covered up media events, it's an understandable mistake for the BBC to make. That doesn't justify it, but it's not in the interest of an encyclopedia to link to a homemade video about why they dislike the BBC. So that's my two cents; ditto everything Informed Owl said. --J. Atkins (talk - contribs) 20:45, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on James Reynolds (correspondent). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090102182449/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/pressoffice/biographies/biogs/news/jamesreynolds.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/biographies/biogs/news/jamesreynolds.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)