Talk:James Tracy (conspiracy theorist)
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
Requested move 6 July 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Not·Really·Soroka 05:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
James Tracy (communication scholar) → James Tracy (conspiracy theorist) – James Tracy is primarily known for being a conspiracy theorist, not a communication scholar. The article itself dedicates only a single line to his credentials with remainder talking about his conspiracies and subsequent legal troubles. Accordingly it makes little sense to refer to him as communication scholar as it's not particularly enlightening as to his identity and not really what the article covers and addresses. Open to other suggestions as well. (Examples of other pages with conspiracy theorist as the descriptor: Cathy O'Brien, John Todd etc.) | MK17b | (talk) 01:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Per the examples and that
American conspiracy theorist
seems to have been in lead for quite awhile. I'd also probably support other suggestions. Skynxnex (talk) 13:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)