Talk:Anna Kournikova (computer virus)
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Anna Kournikova (computer virus). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Anna Kournikova (computer virus) at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Anna Kournikova (computer virus) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 June 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 11, 2020, February 11, 2021, and February 11, 2024. |
Category:Windows viruses is itself a category within Category:Computer viruses. — Robert Greer (talk) 01:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
TACOOOOOO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.90.0 (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anna Kournikova (computer virus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615003400/http://www.networkworld.com/news/2001/0913annavirus.html to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2001/0913annavirus.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Ross Geller's laptop
editThe last sentence of the section In popular culture currently states Moreover, the computer was a PowerBook G4, with which Windows-targeting malware would not be compatible. I was about to improve the wording of the sentence following the comma when I thought, what if Ross had Virtual PC installed on it? Wouldn't this worm have had an effect within the virtual machine? I will tag the sentence with Template:Disputed inline. —173.129.175.205 (talk) 18:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- I think you're reading too much into a sitcom, and crediting the writers and the characters they create with far too much complexity. I don't consider it a distinction worth making and would advocate removal of the disputed tag. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- I was about to remove the tag after realizing that Ross must have written his speech using a Mac word processor and therefore would have had it saved outside any Windows VM he may have had on the PowerBook. But another editor has removed the entire section for being unsourced trivia. —173.129.175.205 (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Effect
editHaving read through the article back and forth a couple of times, I cannot find any clue of what this virus actually did other than forwarding itself to the recipient’s contacts? What damage did it actually cause and thus what makes it actually notable?Tvx1 21:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)