Talk:January 2016 Istanbul bombing
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the January 2016 Istanbul bombing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reflist columns
editUser:Kristijh: could you please explain here whats the point of increasing column in reflist? --Saqib (talk) 10:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Should stay at 30em. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Removal of table
editI originally removed the table of victims on 13 January for the following reasons "Tables are rarely to be used in articles and only done so when prose cannot adequately cover the topic. This is a poor example of where to use a table.". It has since been added back by @Ernio48: without rationale. I will use the talk page to further explain Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables. First of all listing such a tiny amount of information is prefered in list format rather than a table "If a list is simple, it is generally better to use one of the standard Wikipedia list formats instead of a table." Second of all prose is better than both "Prose is preferred in articles as prose allows the presentation of detail and clarification of context, in a way that a table may not." As it stands, the table is replicating the information already explained in the prose, so it is quite obvious that prose is suitable. If anyone thinks the table is important enough to sacrifice the flow of the article, then please post reasons in this section. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 20:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- No, its removal was a sound edit. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on January 2016 Istanbul bombing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160114021056/http://www.todayszaman.com/anasayfa_sultanahmet-suicide-bomber-spends-11-days-in-i-stanbul-before-attack_370026.html to http://www.todayszaman.com/anasayfa_sultanahmet-suicide-bomber-spends-11-days-in-i-stanbul-before-attack_370026.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.todayszaman.com/latest-news_explosion-rocks-historic-i-stanbul-square-casualties-reported_409409.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304075646/http://radio.gov.pk/newsdetail/81863/1 to http://radio.gov.pk/newsdetail/81863/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)