This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
"Instead, Jay signed an agreement that ignored the problem of the Mississippi in exchange for commercial advantages benefiting the Northeast"
The Fact is that Jay got New Orleans and the Spanish Carribean opened to US Trade, which is what he was sent to do, though there has been much bias against the treaty since (Mostly by US Southerners) User: 24.195.140.10 20:24, October 11, 2006
With regard to the comment above, the commenter has confused the Jay-Gardoqui negotiations and unratified treaty of the 1780s with the Pinckney-Gardoqui treaty of 1795. That the lower-Mississippi and New Orleans remained closed to American shipping until then wqs one of the important causes of the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794. Prof. Todd Carney / Southern Oregon University 18:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcarney57 (talk • contribs)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article is clearly written from an American perspective, listing U.S. complaints, but ignoring any issues that may have concerned Britain or Spain. Please balance it out if you have more information. Honbicot02:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
It is really only remembered for being an American (i.e. U.S.) Treaty. So other perspectives are somewhat lacking. I wish you luck in researching it though. Naufana² : (talk)19:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
