Talk:Jessy Schram

Fair use rationale for Image:Jessy Schram.jpg

Image:Jessy Schram.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Prod

This actress is clearly notable. Her article just needs to be wikified.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Wait a second. Is this imdb entry a hoax. I can not find her on www.flickr.com in a New York Times Search. Either it is a hoax or this actress has made a concerted effort to keep herself off of the internet. I can't believe there are no WP:RS to be found. Maybe it should be deleted.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

TV.com and IMDB are reliable sources. Just because you think some entry may be a hoax doesn't make them unreliable--you'd firstly need a more reliable source to prove the hoax. And your own WP:OR on photo-sharing sites and such definitely doesn't count as a WP:RS in the first place--definitely not a more reliable source than IMDB or TV.com. (PS. I have no problem finding her on the NY Times site[1], flickr[2], or photobucket[3].) Removing template until an acceptable reason is given for having it. 24.243.3.27 (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Riding Shotgun

Is 2013 Riding Shotgun Abby from Riding Shotgun (comics)? If so, the title should link to the article, and the notes should point out the short was a cartoon she was voice acting, not a live-action thing in which she appeared. Also, has that short ever actually been on TV, or only online? Maybe list it separately from her television roles, or at least add a note that it's an online exclusive? 71.121.143.40 (talk) 06:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jessy Schram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123013458/http://www.maxim.com/Americanpiejessyschram/video/945.aspx to http://www.maxim.com/Americanpiejessyschram/video/945.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)