Talk:Jodi Rell

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Title

edit

Whoever removed the title "Her Excellency" from the article should seriously read oh, I don't know, virtually every document published by the governor's office, most of which clearly display her title as "Her Excellency". Example: [1]. I'm for putting the title back unless someone can give a good enough reason not to, considering I've seen the title used on a number of documents published by her office. ||bass 05:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

In Connecticut, we number our Governors starting from colonial times. That makes Rell the 102nd governor, not the 82nd. See the full list for an updated order, along with an explanation in the notes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.72.119 (talk) 06:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Homemaker"

edit

I've deleted Rell's other supposed occupation. Unless she's made some claim to the title, I see no reason why someone who's in her third decade of elected office would need anything other than "Legislator." Cory.willis 08:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've corrected your incorrect edit. According to the New York Times (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/m_jodi_rell/index.html) she is "A former homemaker who dropped out of college..." The legislature in the State of Connecticut is NOT full time. How can one say this is their profession when she cannot, by law, work full time in it? The legislature is part-time and pays a meager stipend. Her husband owns a business and Ms. Rell stayed home to take care of her kids. (HartfordCT) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hartfordct (talkcontribs) 14:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Based on that theory, there are plenty of CT legislators who ought to have new "professions" as they do not earn money off-session.(including at least one Committee chairmen) Should the single ones be listed as "slackers"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.141.78 (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Moody

edit

Remocved POV material better suited to the gubernatorial election article anyway.

It got added back so If one insists, lets have a NPOV sourced statement as to the circusmtances, not unsourced speculative theories

Poll

edit

I took out the reference to "recent polls" as it was out of date. The last poll I can find online is from September, so that number may not be accurate anymore. Gerardw (talk) 14:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Other

edit

this image disappeared so i removed it

File:Rell takes over.jpg 67.165.24.165 20:49, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This is opinion: " She also supports a lawsuit in response to the No Child Left Behind Act. Connecticut's Attorney General Richard Blumenthal filed the lawsuit against the US Department of Education to force Bush to amend the act because it would make Connecticut, which already has the most rigorous standardized testing curriculum in the country, to spend tens of millions of its own tax dollars to pay for unfunded federal mandates. The act as it stands now would force the state to pay for standardized testing every school year, instead of every 2 years, even though the State Department of Education says it will provide little new information about students' academic progress."--69.37.125.45 23:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I redid some of Gabe's edits. If you think a state would have a large surplus with a spendthrift governor.....well....

No one in CT knows this woman as anything but Jodi Rell. It's not a "nickname". Check the highway signs

Krayeske

edit

The section on Krayeske is unsourced, not WP:NPOV (e.g. mysterious incarceration) and not notable. I'm removing it. Gerardw (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Gerard - never seen the stuff on conflict of interest before. MY mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.141.212 (talk) 19:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jodi Rell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Jodi Rell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jodi Rell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jodi Rell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply