Talk:John Lewis Partnership

Legal structure

Does anyone know any more about the legal structure of John Lewis? Is it actually a co-operative? Secretlondon 12:44, Dec 3, 2003 (UTC)

Its a PLC so it issues shares. Secretlondon 12:46, Dec 3, 2003 (UTC). But it claims to be run by its employees - and gives a 'dividend' to them. Bah - its not a straight-forward co-operative (it would be an Industrial and Provident society under British Law - not a PLC). It's hybrid - and I'm confused. ;) Secretlondon 12:51, Dec 3, 2003 (UTC)

John Lewis Partnership PLC is a public unquoted company that wholly own John Lewis PLC and a bunch of about 25 limited companies such as Waitrose Limited, John Lewis Car Finance Ltd etc. As at 31/01/2003 they had shareholder funds of about £1.4bn or about £25,000 per employee. Distribution of shares is (probably) proportional to annual pay [1]. Total dividend payout appears to be £200,000 or £4 per employee for year to 31/01/2003.... these seems too low... I clearly don't know how to read financial statements!

As for the power, as opposed to corporate, structure... see the external link in the article Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 14:07, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)

The reason for the £200,000 pound dividend payment is because in the early post war era the company was very short of funds and had to issue shares to raise some capital. Instead of issuing ordinary shares (where you own part of the company) they issued preference shares instead. These give you a right to a fixed dividend but don't give you any voting or other rights in the company.

Corperate structure is roughly as follows, John Lewis Partnership is a PLC, but all the shares(with the exeption of the afforementioned preferance shares) are owned by the a Trust set up by the Founder for the benefit of the employees. The profits are distributed in cash (well bank transfer) anually around the end of March, as a percentage of salary. The percentage varies each year the highest recently was around 22%, the lowest about 8%. The issue of the preferance shares should be largely ignored, they are entirely insignificant in the structure of the company.

Senior people in a coop where I was a member Poptel comented that JL is realy a Co-op but doesn't use the term.

And Poptel the company was owned by the coop via a complex trust

Question: Does that complex trust truly contain clauses related to the death of kings? I refer you to this interesting quote from http://www.newstatesman.com/199911150025:

If the demutualisers take the long view, they could decide to wait till the present trust expires, which it does 21 years after the death of the last surviving descendant of King Edward VII who was alive in 1929 - namely, the Queen and the Earl of Harewood. For customers of the 25 department stores and 118 Waitrose food shops, the worry must be whether the homage to Spedan Lewis will not, eventually, cause the same kinds of fatal delay in innovation that did for the Co-op as a serious movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.118.251.61 (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I suspect that JL is not a true cooperative! If it was, JL would emphasise that each employee had equal voting share. As far as I can see they only say things like "everybody has a say". Therefore I guess that power is very unequally distributed amongst employees. Of course I hope that I am wrong and that one of you tells me so. —Preceding comment added by --Turifo (talk) 20:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

John Lewis Partnership plc is legally established an unlisted public limited company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.136.142 (talk) 18:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

JLP is not a partnership in the legal company sense, it is not a workers co-operative, it is not owned by its employees, it is not a private company, and it is not a mutual. All of which was contained in the article, and has now been removed. None of which are accurate. JLP may call its employees partners, but that is just a title. JLP may give employees seats on the board, or on committees, but they are simply appointments to roles, and nothing else, it is not employee owned decision making, mutual members expressing their voting. JLP has a separate legal personality, a partnership under the law of England and Wales does not, and cannot, only an LLP or a Company can have a legal personality. JLP is a company. A Public Company. An unlisted public company, it is not a private company as the article tried to claim. Paying employees a share of profits through a trust is a form of a bonus scheme, and is not employee ownership, mutualisation, of a workers co-op. This article needs to be accurate, simply calling something a partnership does not in the legal sense make something a partnership. Sport and politics (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Confusing text for Southampton

I've removed the following annotation from the Southampton entry:

(under the Tyrrell & Green name until the move to West Quay in 1998, then opened in 2000)

because it doesn't make meaningful sense. Are we saying the store traded as Tyrell & Green both before 1998 and after 2000, but traded as John Lewis in the short interim. Or did it move to West Quay in 1998, but for some strange reason didn't reopen for two years after the move. Or what?. If you know enough to rewrite this annotation in english, please feel free to do so and reinstate. -- Chris j wood 15:50, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

I do not believe it traded as Tyrell & Green post-2000 and JohnLewis.com lists it as JL Southhampton --Davidprior 07:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Question on logo usage

Two quite different (in colour and font) John Lewis logos (Image:JLlogo.PNG and Image:JLPlogo.PNG} have been added to this article. Neither image page has a description. Does the John Lewis Partnership still use both, or is one historic?. If both are in use, what decides which is used where?. -- Chris j wood 13:52, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

JLlogo is the logo of the shop. The font matches that shown in the shop sign in the photo (which was taken very recently). JLPlogo is the logo of the partnership (the company that ownes the John Lewis stores, among other things). This is the logo used on their webpage (http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/). Note that when that webpage refers to the store specifically, they use JLlogo. So both are current, and I think both are sensible things to have in the article. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 14:00, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

I thought that might be the case from the placement in the article, but didn't want to jump to conclusions. I've updated the captions and image descriptions to reflect this. I agree both are sensible to have, but I'm just wondering if it may be better to have two articles. One on the John Lewis department store chain, and one on the John Lewis Partnership as owners of that chain, Waitrose, etc. -- Chris j wood 14:39, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

That makes sense, but I don't know how much there is to write about the partnership, though. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 14:44, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

The changeover of names was virtually instant, the partnership's presence in Southampton prior to it's move into the West Quay shopping centre was in a building that dates back to before World War Two. It was certainly called "Tyrell & Green" until it's closure, which, as I say was the day before the opening of the new location down the road. The building is still empty to this day, unfortunate for a building closed down in the last millenia -- D Hockey | Talk 03:02, November 30, 2006 (UTC)

Typo in Revenue?

A revenue of about £5 million in 2005? Shurely Shome Mishtake. That works out at around £70 annual revenue per employee. --Gantlord 18:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Former location - Warrington

I have removed the last entry by user 212.219.95.3 as it is incorrect. I think it might be a minor violation. -- AndrewSE19 10:18, 22 September 2006

All the revenue figures are wrong/misleading

The numbers shown are gross sales (including VAT), not revenue. Gross sales figures are widely used in the retail industry, but they are not comparable to figures for non-retail businesses and it is misleading to give them as the only figure here. I don't have time to correct this just now. Cotterstock (talk) 20:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Update

Greenbee has changed to John Lewis insurance. Some parts of Greenbee still exist, some are being phased out, or removed with plans to bring back at a later date. Greenbee no longer exists. This is why I added the Update tag. I will do it myself, given some time, but I am currently working on the John Lewis (department store) page. DrMotley (talk) 18:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Partnership Democracy

As a former long-serving employee of John Lewis, and indeed a Partner who served on a number of their internal democratic bodies, I can assure you first-hand that said democratic bodies are entirely powerless talking-shops (at least at the lower echelons). They have no power whatsoever to influence John Lewis policy, or the direction of the business. Only topics pre-approved by management are up for discussion, and the only resolutions passed are those that can be implemented with a minimum of fuss or expense (for example, regarding the sort of sandwich fillings that are available in the canteen). The sole purpose of these "democratic" bodies is to give the illusion to "rank and file" employees, and external observers that the John Lewis Partnership is in some way a caring, progressive and inclusive organisation, whereas in fact they treat their employees with a good deal more contempt than most. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.68.95 (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Other Businesses?

A bond prospectus from 2010 lists a number of other businesses belonging to the group. Source is on page 28 here http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/content/dam/cws/pdfs/financials/John_Lewis_plc_Prospectus.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.81.209 (talk • contribs) 10:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

External Links

Just removed some spam from the External Links section and was wondering should all of the partnerships various websites be listed? I understand having Johnlewis.com and Waitrose.com but should the ones for their credit card and other services really be on there? Seems like advertising to me? Drmotley (talk) 08:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

OR tag

There are several sections that go without citations and appear to involve some kind of unsourced declarations/synthesis, e.g., these two:

The credit card follows on from, and supersedes, the John Lewis (and Waitrose) account cards which have been around for 40 years. These cards are no longer available, and holders of these are being encouraged to replace them with the Partnership card. They can, however, still be used, and some cards from the mid-1970s are still in use.

The John Lewis Partnership currently operates one manufacturing business, Herbert Parkinson, in Darwen, Lancashire. This company, established as a weaver of jacquard fabrics in 1934, was acquired by the partnership in 1953. Herbert Parkinson currently produce John Lewis own brand fabrics and curtains as well as filled furnishing products such as cushions and pillows.

In general, there's a lot of stuff that at least appears to come from first-hand knowledge and not from independent, reliable sources. And if it can't be backed up by RS, it shouldn't be in the encyclopedia. czar · · 16:41, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on John Lewis Partnership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071011025254/http://www.partnershipcard.co.uk:80/html/benefits.jsp to http://www.partnershipcard.co.uk/html/benefits.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on John Lewis Partnership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120210091635/http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/TemplatePage.aspx?PageType=CAT&PageID=75 to http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/TemplatePage.aspx?PageType=CAT&PageID=75

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on John Lewis Partnership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120216060231/http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/17062009/325/online-grocer-ocado-float-next-year.html to http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/17062009/325/online-grocer-ocado-float-next-year.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110926230850/http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/Display.aspx?MasterId=3121d339-1d4c-4e8f-8d18-6f7c00a941ba&NavigationId=1612 to http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/Display.aspx?MasterId=3121d339-1d4c-4e8f-8d18-6f7c00a941ba&NavigationId=1612
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111007123004/http://www.johnlewis-partnership.net/Display.aspx?MasterId=dbfd085b-df14-4605-8547-d947213112b2&NavigationId=549/ to http://www.johnlewis-partnership.net/Display.aspx?MasterId=dbfd085b-df14-4605-8547-d947213112b2&NavigationId=549/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120223091807/http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=539553/ to http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=539553/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Never Knowingly Undersold is not the JLP slogan

Being somewhat dubious about this articles claim of the Never Knowingly Undersold (NKU) slogan being that of the John Lewis Partnership, and the total lack of any citations (1st- or 3rd-party), I've delved further. According to this search on the johnlewispartnership.co.uk website, the NKU slogan is only used by John Lewis stores, and not by either Waitrose nor the JLP. I shall therefore remove the slogan from this article - except for when it refers specifically to the JL stores. 143.159.18.79 (talk) 18:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion

Talk:John Lewis (Georgia politician) In ictu oculi (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Lewis Partnership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130206011900/http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/about/john-lewis/making-our-own-textiles.html to http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/about/john-lewis/making-our-own-textiles.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.johnlewis-partnership.net/Display.aspx?MasterId=dbfd085b-df14-4605-8547-d947213112b2&NavigationId=549%2F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• JL Partnership Logo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Financial performance

https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/financials/financial-reports/annual-reports.html

near the end of these records in the past 5 years of Financial performance, it seems figures are different on this document to what wiki is showing

for example, the document has:

Header text	2016	2015	2014	2013	2012
Wiki Profit before tax	N/A	342.7	376.4	509.0	393.3
Partnership Bonus, tax and exceptional item	305.5	342.7	376.4	343.3	353.8

seems prior to 2014 people were using a different figure. for the time being, I've halted my edit as a priority now would be to make sure all the figures are consistent

Same applies to Profit retained, document states "Profit for the year" was £101.0 million in 2013 while wiki "Profit retained" is £198.8 million — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.97.194.212 (talk) 01:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

"Privately-held public limited company"

Hi,

I was going to edit this myself, but I chose to ask here in case I have misunderstood.

How can the company be a privately held public company? It's a public limited company, so how can it be privately-held? Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of being a public limited company? Strugglehouse (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

According to Companies House, it is a public limited company so that is how it should be described. Dormskirk (talk) 14:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

@Dormskirk Yes, I believe this too. I think "privately-held" should be removed. Strugglehouse (talk) 15:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)