This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
In reading the lead before any other part, the connection between the executive council resigning and Rolph helping to plan the rebellion is not clear, if there even is meant to be a link. Could the connection between the two events be emphasised further in the lead or if necessary a separate reason for Rolph's involvement in the rebellion be given?
I moved the executive council sentence to the previous paragraph to avoid linking the two events. I added information that Mackenzie convinced Rolph to support the rebellion, in exchange for Rolph becoming president of the new state. Z1720 (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
In 1824, Rolph was elected to the Legislative Assembly of Upper Canada to represent Middlesex. When he was elected in 1836, the constituency boundaries changed and the constituency was called Norfolk, and he was elected to the Legislative Assembly of Upper Canada. In 1841, the colony of Upper Canada merged with Lower Canada to create the Province of Canada, so when Rolph was elected in his old constituency of Norfolk, he was elected to the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada. Z1720 (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The number of children in the infobox needs citing as the information doesn't appear elsewhere
This is in the body as, "In 1834, he married Grace Haines; they would have three sons and a daughter." and cited to two sources.
"After the Battle of Queenston Heights, American forces released him in a prisoner exchange" - could you provide a date for his exchange/arrival in Canada?
"Conservatives" is used in paragraph two and "Tory politicians" used in paragraph three. Recommend only one version is used throughout.
Changed to Tory, as persons at that time were more likely to be called Tories. I will search the whole article to replace instances of this. Z1720 (talk) 16:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
"He decided not to run in the 1830 Upper Canada election" - this seems like quite a big decision, do we know his reasoning?
The lead states that he "examined the feasibility of creating the City of Toronto" while in this section it is described as "appointed to a committee to examine the incorporation of York into the city of Toronto" which sounds as if the city already existed, needs clarification one way or the other
First mention of aldermen on second line needs linking to Alderman
Done
"He ran to be Toronto's first mayor, but the city's aldermen chose William Lyon Mackenzie" - is it possible to provide a particular reason for his defeat?
Added reasoning from the source.
Another Cholera outbreak! As previous, could it be noted whether either of these were part of the 1826–1837 cholera pandemic?
Lots of cholera outbreaks! (Well, just two, afaik) they were probably part of the pandemic, don't know how to integrate the link into the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Were any of Bond Head's unilateral decisions particularly noteworthy or was it a build up of small annoyances and changes as the text currently suggests?
None of them are noteworthy for Rolph's biography because Bond Head did reject or oppose a policy that Rolph championed (mostly because Rolph wasn't on the council long enough to propose his own policy agenda.)
The beginning of the last paragraph needs adjusting to highlight that the tactics Rolph was objecting to were Bond Head's
Who are these Patriot troops and where do they come from?
Clarified that Patriot troops were mostly from American Hunters' Lodges
"He continued his medical school in Rochester" - this sounds like the Rochester school had already been particularly mentioned but I don't believe it has been in as many words
While Rolph was in the United States, the colonies of Upper Canada and Lower Canada merged to become the Province of Canada, and their legislative assemblies merged to create the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada. I changed the wikilink to clarify this. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
"He gave the administrative tasks of running his medical school to Dr. W. T. Aikens" - who was Aikens? If the point is that Rolph delegated some control of his school upon his return to politics then this can be done without introducing a seemingly unnecessary extra name
A few words pointing out who exactly Hincks and Boulton were would be useful in the second paragraph
Gave Hincks's job title as co-premier of Canada, removed the first Boulton's name, added job title of the second Boulton. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
"who opposed reformer policies" - should "reformer" be capitalised here?
I think that, since this sentence is referring to the movement, and not the political party, it is supposed to be lowercase. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The last sentence of the Return to politics section seems redundant, his opposition to parliament at this time has already been established
Removed
Is "the defeat of the Hincks government" the same event as " Allan MacNab and Augustin-Norbert Morin formed a coalition government"? If so that could be made clearer through some rephrasing
Kind of? Governments were defeated by coalitions, not necessarily elections. I tried clarifying this in the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Some of Political philosophy seems more appropriate in the main text. His part in the moderate group could certainly be alluded to at the first introduction of his part in the Reform faction, and the explanation of Rolph's reasons for joining the rebellion deserve to go in the section describing that event. All but the Cooper and Hobhouse sections seem to be repeats and embellishments of previously established points in the text, and these points such as his leading of the Clear Grit party should be moved there, for example.
Thanks for the review. I am busy in real life so it will take me a few days to address these concerns. If I do not respond in five days, please ping me. Z1720 (talk) 03:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm happy with all your corrections. I've made some minor edits of my own to wording and spelling errors which I hope you won't disagree with (I see you've changed the Tory wikilink before I managed to get my edit summary finished here - thank you!). A few queries remain:
Rochester needs a link and/or directions, I've no idea where it is!
Linked
Morrison is named as a 'fellow Reform leader' in the lead but not introduced as such in the main text
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that John Rolph(pictured) was arrested for trying to solve Euclid's geometry problems? Source: Godfrey, Charles (1993). John Rolph: Rebel with Causes, page 18.
Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments6 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The graph you linked shows there were two spikes of interest in the politician, the largest and most recent in 2021, when they got 17k views in a single day when usually they get a handful. Other than that, the traffic is by and large comparable, so it's unclear how this proves primary topic by usage. Can you clarify the long-term significance argument? --Joy (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.