Talk:John Rowan (Kentucky politician)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Rowan (Kentucky)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Astrocog (talk · contribs) 14:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

AstroCog will be your reviewer

I'll start a review of this article today. Please be patient. All general comments and questions to me should be added to this section, and should be signed properly. All comments and questions concerning the review itself should go in in the review below. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

• I've gone through and made minor edits, including spelling and grammar, to the article. I also fixed the alt text on a couple images. AstroCog (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written all-around. Some minor spelling and grammar issues, which I fixed myself.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No problems here. Meticulous referencing throughout. Anything that is potentially controversial is properly cited.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   I walked away from this article feeling like I got a good, broad overview of Rowan's life. Places in the article which involved other subjects or issues were well-integrated with Rowan's life, so there wasn't a feeling of too much digression.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Good job with neutrality. I liked the attention to such things as the "Kentucky Home" song, in the last section, and how claims about its origin were objectively scrutinized.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No problems here.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Again, no problems. A couple images needed alt-text, but I put those in myself.

7. Overall: This is really quite a nice article, and Acdixon should be commended for developing and curating it. This is an easy pass to GA status. Congratulations!

   Pass/Fail:

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Rowan (Kentucky). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912035825/http://apps.sos.ky.gov/secdesk/sosinfo/default.aspx to http://apps.sos.ky.gov/secdesk/sosinfo/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 25 April 2017 (UTC)