Talk:Kangaroo leather

Copyright

Copyright permission for use in this article of matterial from the site www.kangaroo-industry.asn.au has been sent to the OTRS Tjkkjm (talk) 01:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Biased?

This article reads like a press release; in fact, major portions are copied verbatim from an industry Website (http://www.kangaroo-industry.asn.au/products/leather_review.htm). The person who created the article claims to have copyright permission, but does not claim that the content is compatible with the GFDL, as Wikipedia requires (right?).

The person who created the article has been contributing to Wikipedia for just 13 days, and nearly all of their work has been in the article on kangaroo meat. Their changes there have spun the article into a marketing piece; they added claims of health and environmental improvements, removed statements that the meat is unpopular, removed references to practices unappealing to Western tastes (e.g., drinking the blood), removed references to its use by aboriginal Australians, and removed references to criticism of the kangaroo industry. They have also made massive multi-paragraph changes and marked them as "minor", and repeatedly undone edits apparently made to remove bias.

I believe this article should be deleted, and perhaps replaced by something built on actual research.

Metageek (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

• Firstly I would like to draw your attention to Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers - we were all new to wikipedia once. It is also essential to assume good faith. Certainly this article needs improving, as do many other articles on wikipedia. As to the article on kangaroo meat, some changes have been reverted - ie the removal of references to the eating of kangaroo by aboriginals including the drinking of blood. Other references have been removed by other editors (including me) because they were unreferenced and were in violation of our policy on verifiability and also our policy on no original research. Those policies apply to all articles on wikipedia, these two included.
  Anybody is welcome to contribute to wikipedia and to add material - if you wish to add "something built on actual research" - do so.
  Whether the release of this copyrighted info complies with GFDL comaptability will be up to the person who reviews the OTRS case. --Matilda ^talk 21:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kangaroo leather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100807001108/http://www.officialwire.com/main.php?action=posted_news to http://www.officialwire.com/main.php?action=posted_news&rid=146493

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kangaroo leather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070129135733/http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/wild-harvest/kangaroo/biology.html to http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/wild-harvest/kangaroo/biology.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080722070130/http://kangaroo-industry.asn.au/media/sci_list.html to http://www.kangaroo-industry.asn.au/media/sci_list.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828140421/http://www.fate.unsw.edu.au/glance/index.htm to http://www.fate.unsw.edu.au/glance/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)