Talk:Karthi

Image

File:Karthi image.jpg Karthi in his wedding. Add it to the article? Secret of success (Talk) 13:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Dont you think that the image is a copy vio. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 15:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Karthi.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:Karthi.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Karthi ranjani.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Karthi Ranjani.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Karthi Ranjani.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Karthi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 12:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Will review it in coming days. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 12:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The article doesn't have an image in infobox, which sounds like a skyscraper without basement. Please give your level best to obtain for the same. -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 15:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

It is not necessary that an article nominated for GA must have an infobox image. I tried hard for a free image but with no luck till now. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 19:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Comment to reviewer:The article was recently copy-edited after I made a request at the guild. So I think there must not be any major issues. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 19:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Just as the lead issue will be solve, i will be happy to pass the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 05:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Now does it look good. —Commander _{(Ping me)} 12:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Image is not a issue, however it will be much appreciated if on can get it. Since it has been copy-edited by GOCE, i am striking that comment. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 11:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a second copy-edit as requested; please tell me if there's anything specific I should be doing. It will take 2-4 days depending on RL, quote-checking etc. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

• Done. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	As per MOS:DASH, hyphens (-) have to be replaced by en dash (–) and em dash (—). Needs a small copyedit, you may request it here. The article has been copy-edited for the second time. --Commander (Ping Me) 15:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The lead section should act like an introduction to the article, however much content of the lead should be moved to respective sections. I think this section from MOS:LEAD will help understand that better. The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources, and the notability of the article's subject is usually established in the first few sentences. Significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article.  Done I guess now it looks like summarising the whole article. —Commander (Ping me) 12:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC) Template:IndicText needs to be added.  Done --Commander (Ping Me) 15:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Section 5 is not completely referred. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC) "Section 5"? Can you be more particular in pointing out which section. --Commander (Ping Me) 06:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC) "Filmography". ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)  Done --Commander (Ping Me) 08:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
	2c. it contains no original research.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Any reason why File:Karthi in Paruthiveeran.jpg is not in the infobox. Also provide a WP:ALT for it. The image is a screenshot from one of his films. Generally we prefer free images for "infobox". But for this actor there doesn't exist any free image. --Commander (Ping Me) 11:14, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
	7. Overall assessment.	Article passed. Congrats! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

This is a good article.

This article is well written and had lots of references to me this is the best of Wikipedia and is an article to be emulated by other editors. Congratulations.

User:kipsizoo NairobiKenya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kipsizoo (talk • contribs) 05:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Karthi in Paruthiveeran.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Karthi in Paruthiveeran.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Karthi77.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Karthi77.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Karthi77.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karthi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726022319/http://www.starboxoffice.com/kollywood/vijayawards/about.html to http://www.starboxoffice.com/kollywood/vijayawards/about.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:46, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Kaatru Veliyidai

Who said karthis characters name is VCP Muthi Kumar?? Pr2152000 (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't know, and yes, it was wrong for someone to have added that name since the film has not yet released. Feel free to remove. --Kailash29792 (talk) 02:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Karthi filmography

Do we really need this filmography page with only 19 films under his credit? Looks like a case of WP:CFORK, just like many other filmographies of some south Indian actors/actresses. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

I think it's because amateur editors here are usually like, "Suriya gets a filmography! Now his brother should have one too!", but I think it's safe to draftify the filmography list until it is comprehensive. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

I don't think this can be a valid reason to fork out so many unnecessary articles. Agreed on the 'draft' part though. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)