Talk:Katowice historic railway station

(Redirected from Talk:Katowice historic train station)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Some more detail from pl sources

edit

Polish speaking editors may want to see some additional details I discuss at pl:Dyskusja:Stary dworzec kolejowy w Katowicach. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Monument since

edit

[1] states 1985, but I think it's the typo. [2] gives 1975; both documents have the same month and day (18 December), and the same monument number "A - 1218/75." In that number, the /75 means 1975, so the 1985 listing is, to repeat myself, almost certainly a typo. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katowice historic train station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply