Talk:Kayo Satoh
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBT WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editPlease add to this page to improve it! Sepiraph (talk) 16:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
So... she is a he?
editIs this model a transvestite or did he/she go through a sex change? If it's the former, I would say Satoh should be referred to (and categorized) as a "he"; if the latter, then the opposite. I also removed the LGBT tag, as the subject's sexual orientation does not appear to have been established. Mbinebri talk ← 13:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, the subject of this article lives and works as a female despite having been born a male. If you do a quick search for images on Google, you'll see why this was such a revelation. But back to the point at hand, this person's case clearly corresponds to the definition of transgender for which the "T" in LGBT stands. I think we should stick with the well-established definitions laid out in that article rather than making up our own arbitrary definitions about what does or does not qualify. --DAJF (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
He has not yet received sex operation or legal gender change; therefore, he is legally male and thus should be referred to as "he". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.11.178 (talk) 20:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- I believe you are correct in saying that the person is still legally male, but the Wikipedia guidelines at MOS:IDENTITY give the following recommendations for the wording to be used in articles about persons in this situation:
- "Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to using the gendered nouns, pronouns, and possessive adjectives that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies when referring to any phase of that person's life."
- I haven't come across any coverage that has used the male pronoun in English or Japanese to describe Kayo Satoh (which in case you were not aware is a female name). --DAJF (talk) 07:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Is it worth mentioning
editThat she is also one on the World's top street fighter players? I can provide sources. 69.132.79.61 (talk) 19:40, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think it's definitely worth a mention. For a large portion of USA and Japan, she's known first as a competitive fighting game player, and one of the best. And gaining note in Japan as a fighting gamer, regardless of the circumstances of your other fame, is quite an accomplishment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.118.109 (talk) 22:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- It may be worth mentioning, but it needs to be reliably sourced - as per WP:BLP. --DAJF (talk) 00:58, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- She competed in EVO this year and won her first two matches and lost both of her losers' bracket matches, making her tied for 6th in her pool (73). Given that there were 91 pools, it can be extrapolated that she tied for 456th place out of 1456 competitors. Saying that she's one of the top SSFIV players in the world is stretching it a bit. Even restricting it to just C. Viper players from Japan wouldn't be enough to make her stand out that much. Still, two wins at the world's biggest SSFIV tournament is pretty respectable. She'd beat me handily.
- I definitely think that it's worth a mention, as it's very notable, but she's a gaming celebrity, not a top professional. 65.102.182.22 (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
It boggles my mind how just because its a good looking person that plays video games you automatically jump to the conclusion "VIDEO GAME PRO IS ALSO A MODEL, MODELS PLAY VIDEO GAMES. WE NEED TO MAKE THIS KNOWN!". Still doesn't change the fact that you aren't good looking and will never end up with a good looking person by playing games. This disregards that he isn't that good, he may be one of the top tranny players but then again I doubt many people openly fight for that title. mcnichoj (talk) 07:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Mcnichoj, quite apart from the blatant transphobia in your comment (using "he" when she has clearly expressed a female gender identity is every bit as insulting as calling her "it", and "tranny" is a highly derogatory term), the fact remains that Kayo Satoh is involved in both modelling and gaming at a high level and if she is to have a Wikipedia article then both of those facts are relevant and should be included. I don't see why that should "boggle your mind", unless you have a personal problem with either models or gamers or both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.24.194 (talk) 12:24, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- I also feel it should be mentioned. 108.217.45.210 (talk) 01:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kayo Satoh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100929141128/http://www.ntv.co.jp/don/contents01/2010/09/post-90.html to http://www.ntv.co.jp/don/contents01/2010/09/post-90.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)