Talk:Kevin Heffernan (actor)

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources to use for references

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

So today, the legendary User:Praxidicae redirected most of the members of Broken Lizard to the troupe article. I objected, and was challenged to source the articles. Sigh. No good deed goes unpunished. See User_talk:Praxidicae#Steve_Lemme_and_Kevin_Heffernan_(actor).

This section will serve to list sources that will be used to provide references for the article. Probably by me, but if someone else wants to help, great! Many of these are interviews, which ... wp:interview ... If we were using these for Wikipedia:Notability, there could be a problem, but we're not, we're relying on WP:NACTOR to pass Wikipedia:Notability. We're going to be using these to back non-controversial facts about the subject, as said by the subject, in other words WP:ABOUTSELF. Some of these are also more reliable sources than others, if we can use the best ones we will. --GRuban (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

Since you've pinged me here with a bad attempt at subtle snark, you're missing a big part of it: WP:ABOUTSELF is sufficient to verify facts about a subject, it is not sufficient to establish notability. Being the main character in one movie with several others in part of a larger group is probably enough to redirect and merge to an article. Having minor roles in a bunch of other films and without meaningful coverage of the individual, does not make one notable. Also half of your sources are blatantly unreliable, newsbreak.com, for example is garbage, it's an aggregate site that scrapes from other places (and in this case, one that is unreliable.) Praxidicae (talk) 19:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Yup, I addressed both of those points in what I wrote, these aren't to establish notability, and some are better than others, and we'll use the best ones when we can. I'll appreciate your help. --GRuban (talk) 19:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your understanding of sourcing leaves a lot to be desired and no you did not "address" any of the issues I brought up. Merely appearing in films or shows doesn't satisfy any part of NACTOR, despite your interpretation. It's about whether or not it's a main character and whether or not the individual has received coverage. Having 500 credits as "Guy A behind counter smoking a cigarette" does not make anyone notable. Praxidicae (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to take the liberty to move the discussion parts together, and the source list together. Agree with your facts; except the part where you seem to think that I'm mad at you. I'm not, I realize you're doing your best to improve the Wikipedia. Together, we'll make this a much better article than it was. --GRuban (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic