Talk:Khudafarin Bridges

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khodaafarin Bridges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206215034/http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/bp_caspian/bp_caspian_en/STAGING/local_assets/downloads_pdfs/xyz/BTC_English_ESIAs_Azerbaijan_Content_Baseline_Reports_BTC_ESIA_Baseli-seline_Data.pdf to http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/bp_caspian/bp_caspian_en/STAGING/local_assets/downloads_pdfs/xyz/BTC_English_ESIAs_Azerbaijan_Content_Baseline_Reports_BTC_ESIA_Baseli-seline_Data.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Common name

The common English name for the bridges appear to be different from the one currently used as article title. Here's the results per WP:SET. I have included the keyword "bridge" and excluded "Wikipedia" in searches to filter out all Wikipedia and non-bridge-related results.

Google Advanced Book Search:

• "Khudafarin" 269 results (+23% from second most common result)
• "Khodaafarin" 200 results
• "Khoda Afarin" 219 results

Google Scholar:

• "Khudafarin" 21 results
• "Khodaafarin" 4 results
• "Khoda Afarin" 29 results (+38% from second most common result)

Google News:

• "Khudafarin" 1,430 results (+14200% from second most common result)
• "Khodaafarin" 10 results
• "Khoda Afarin" 6 results

All-Google Search:

• "Khudafarin" about 40,500 results (+1219% from second most common result)
• "Khodaafarin" about 2,580 results
• "Khoda Afarin" about 3,070 results

Every Google search except Google Scholar (coincidentally also the only platform where it is not possible to restrict searches to English-only results) supports the "Khudafarin" spelling. Therefore, I intend to move the article to "Khudafarin Bridges" and adding "Khoda Afarin bridges" as an alternate name in lead in three days if no one objects. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 15:13, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support Khudafarin Bridges. I was curious why the all-Google one is so dominant compared to the others and it seems heavy on Facebook and Instagram usage which I think is interesting and is probably a better reflection of what people use than a tiny difference among scholars. Note that I came here via this canvassing allegation going on at Commons. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

  I also see that this UNESCO page as a Azerbaijan proposal uses "Khudafarin bridges" located in "the Khoda Afarin County" which I find an interesting and intentional choice. I am trying to see if there was an Iranian proposal to get more useful sources. I have no idea of the language or nationalist issues behind these choices but I suspect there is some that people know but don't want to acknowledge. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)