Talk:Kiki Kaikai/GAN

Good article nomination on hold

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of July 16, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Yes, although the Story should be presented ahead of the Gameplay section, it would read a lot better and makes more sense to discuss the plot before details of hidden items, number matches etc are presented.

2. Factually accurate?: Appears to be accurate enough.

3. Broad in coverage?: Yes.

4. Neutral point of view?: Yes.

5. Article stability? Stable.

6. Images?: All tagged correctly.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — The Rambling Man 07:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that template is a bit harsh isn't it?! Anyway, I'll re-review accordingly now you've made the requested changes. All the best... The Rambling Man 16:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

GA review

The results of my re-review are as follows:

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Good work to all involved. The Rambling Man 16:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Great, thanks Rambling Man! Nall 18:43, 16 July 2007