Talk:Kitchen Confidential

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

I'm not so sure that the book and the TV show need to be on the same page...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.28.132 (talk) 13:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jeez Louise, please separate the book and the TV show

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Should never in a million years be in the same article or even spoken of in the same breath. Softlavender (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done: Created a separate article: Kitchen Confidential (television series). Softlavender (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Linking

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are a lot of links that point to the book that should point to the TV series. I don't have the necessary tools to enable me to do this quickly, but I'm hoping someone can disambiguate the pages. 24.41.47.147 (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 16:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Kitchen Confidential: Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly → Kitchen Confidential (book) – I normally dislike proposing "(book)" because almost no one types it for any title. I disambiguated the book because Kitchen Confidential (TV series) is equally popular as the book. I did use "(book)", but I figured that I can use subtitles instead of parenthesis disambiguator. However, due to Talk:Like a Virgin (book), probably "(book)" should substitute for the subtitle "Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly" due to the length of the current article title. I thought nominating the article for deletion or tagging it as possibly non-notable. However, the book inspired the fictional TV series, and it may have existing reviews. Despite the article's current shape, the book may be notable at its own right. Therefore, I am doing the test proposal to inspire other proposals on books with long titles. George Ho (talk) 02:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Support The book is likely independently notable, and the proposed name seems to be far more common, judging by both Bourdain's use of the title and coverage of Bourdain that refers to the book.--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic