Talk:Kawaiicon
Kawaiicon was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 4, 2024). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tips
editYou might want to add additional sources to the article and make the regional spelling of English consistent throughout the article. Alexeyevitch(talk) 20:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Go ahead and correct any inconsistencies you see, or add any sources you know of. I fixed two instances of "organizer". ··gracefool 💬 03:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kawaiicon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Gracefool (talk · contribs) 01:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm afraid this is a quick fail. There are multiple uncited paragraphs. Each paragraph starts with a link to the external website of the conference for that year, but third party sources are needed to establish that what is being covered is notable. If there were just a few uncited sentences it would be possible to resolve the issues in the timeframe of a GA review, but the article needs to be restructured in line with what can be found in third party sources. The list of conferences is fine in itself, as are the links to the conference websites, but they need to be converted into some form of citation rather than embedded as external links. (Wikipedia:External links is not required for GA, but citations are.) Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)