Talk:Kohn Pedersen Fox

Latest comment: 3 years ago by PubHobbyst in topic No history?

Untitled

edit

My concerns - there are no sources listed. No external articles from anywhere else supporting the statements in the article. PEsays (talk) 4:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

article change.

edit

I reverted that a little hastily, but if you want to change the article at least keep the references to their major projects. And try to tone down the cheerleading. Jasongetsdown 19:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

will try and wikify and create some good structure out of the one piece drabble.--Visik 08:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kohn Pedersen Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

No history?

edit

A first section called "Recent work" is highly unusual. Syced (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree this could be seen as promotional formatting. I am going to switch the section so History shows up first. Please discuss here if you think this is an ill advised change. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Excessive Images of Buildings

edit

Is it okay for this page to have this many images? I understand they're an architecture firm, but this almost seems excessive. I have not come across many architecture Wikipedia pages so maybe I'm just not aware of the norm on a page like this. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply