Talk:Kulasekhara Alvar
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kulasekhara Alvar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editSince his Ascension coincided with the beginning of Malayalam as a distinctive language, he shouldn't considered a Tamil King —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.215.49 (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Untitled
editNot a very good article. It says he lived in Kollam and contradicts itself by saying he lived at Srirangam. Neither is true because his capital was Mahabalipuram. No mention of being the founder of Second Cherman Empire and the beginning of Malayalam as a distinctive language which coincided his coronation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.215.49 (talk) 20:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I merged this page
editThere is another wikipedia page for the same person at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulasekara_Alvar, so I took that info, added links and merged it with this one. Shiva das 21:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Aryan-Brhmin theory is proved wrong. What is the basis for quoting that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.201.59.205 (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
WHAT IS THIS
editThe Bhakti cult consolidated the Vedic religion
Tamil bhakti cult does not recorgnise caste system and vedic rituals.Eventhough Bhakti traditions(overall) often fused with Bhagavad Gita and Bhagavata Purana,the traditions which initially start in medieval Tamil Nadu do not adhere/stress to these Sanskrit text and their concepts.It is wrong to include Tamil Bhakti as a part of Vedism as they greatly contraindicate(concepts,rituals)In terms of Pan India situation,this Bhakti traditions only seen as a defence towards other indian and non-indian religions rather than stressing the difference in terms of concept and culture that evolved through different Bhakti movements in different parts of India.--Rajendra Prasath Arumon 18:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajendra Prasath Arumon (talk • contribs)
Childish stupid statements
editAlvars were 12 known Tamil Saints who helped to reestablish Vaishnavism in Tamilakkam.Malayalees as a distinct race only evolved about 13th century and that has nothing to do with Kulasekhara Alwar,Kollam era starts even after his death.PLEASE STOP THESE KIND OF BASELESS CLAIMS AND VANDALISE THE ARTICLE.--Tan Meifen (talk) 12:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Baseless claims is one thing, and it should be countered with properly sourced claims. Vandalism is quite another issue, not the case here. Hoverfish Talk 15:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC)