Talk:Kuns

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kuns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140419215052/http://rus.neicon.ru:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/5811/1_12_02_18.pdf?sequence=1 to http://rus.neicon.ru:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/5811/1_12_02_18.pdf?sequence=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Hungarian Tatars?

[1] What does mean "Hungarian Tatars"? Even the name of the article is "Kuns". "Hungarian Tatars" historical term does not exist, do you have reliable academic source to claim this? Kuns means Cumans in Hungarian not Tatar. OrionNimrod (talk) 13:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Existence?

@Kansas Bear: can you look at this article? It seems like copy paste of Cumans. Also the name Kun is simply a Hungarian exonym for Cuman. Beshogur (talk) 14:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Yes, correct: "Kuns" means "Cumans" in Hungarian langauge, that is. The article should talk about the Cumans in Hungary/Hungarian Cumans or merging to the Cumans. "Hungarian Tatars" name is nonsense, I think no academic source for that. OrionNimrod (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Beshogur! Just I wanted notify, another conversation here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hungary#Removing Hungarian related contents and strange modifications on Hungarian related articles OrionNimrod (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Beshogur, the History section is a mish-mash of childish drivel, the Peter Linehan(copied from the Cumans article) source(page 82) mentions Cumans not Kuns(which makes it Synthesis).

I suggest a complete reversion and verifying of each source that will be used in the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Kansas Bear!

I started to make a conversation with the editor regarding his strange edits who are engaged in edit war Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hungary#Removing Hungarian related contents and strange modifications on Hungarian related articles and here User talk:Beshogur#Hungarian reverts. I suppose this artice should merge to the Cumans main article or talking about the history of Cumans in Hungary/Hungarian Cumans. "Kuns" means simply "Cumans" in Hungarian langauge. OrionNimrod (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Merging to the Cuman article

Norden1990, Borsoka, Gyalu22, I suggest to merge this article to the Cumans one, this article was recently copy-pasted with many contents from Cumans article and here are strange modifications like "Hungarian Tatars", a total false term. OrionNimrod (talk) 10:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

• Agreed. Merging would also remove the original research added in the recent copy-pasting. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
• Agreed, two people are identical. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
• Agree. --Gyalu22 (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)