Talk:2013 Kuwaiti general election
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Seat totals
editI think the source being used to claim Shias won 10 seats is being misused – it lists the religion of all MPs, which is not necessarily the same thing as their political bloc; two of those listed as Shias (Ahmed Hassan Saleh Ashour and Adnan Syed Abdul Samad Ahmed Sayed Zahid) are also members of political parties, so I assume are being counted in other blocs by the other sources. Reducing the number of independents to increase the number of Shia members was definitely incorrect given that the two have political affiliations. Number 57 06:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- The Washington Post and other reliable sources confirmed that there are 10 Shia MPs. Shia MPs are only part of Shia Islamist political parties, they're not part of non-Shia political parties. The article should be as accurate as possible. I'm re-adding this pivotal piece of information. --- Onasloga (talk • contribs) 20:44, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Onasloga: If you readd it, it will be reverted. You need a source that gives the entire results, not just focussing on one group. You are completely misrepresenting the sources. You are referencing the statement "The Shia group was reduced to 10 seats after winning 17 seats in December 2012" with these —source:
- BBC News, which states "Shia candidates won eight seats in the 50-member parliament"
- Washington Post, which does say there were 10 Shias
- Kuwait Politics Database, which lists 10 Shias, but also notes that two of them are members of political parties, and are therefore not part of the Shia group (nor are they independents, which you tried to reduce the number of by two to fit in an extra two Shias).
- Please stop readding misleading information. Number 57 20:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Onasloga: If you readd it, it will be reverted. You need a source that gives the entire results, not just focussing on one group. You are completely misrepresenting the sources. You are referencing the statement "The Shia group was reduced to 10 seats after winning 17 seats in December 2012" with these —source:
I am not adding misleading information. Shia MPs are an identity bloc. There are 10 Shia MPs and two of those MPs are part of political parties (Shia Islamist political parties). The 28 "Independents" are Sunnis. -- Onasloga (talk • contribs) 21:05, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Onasloga: If you revert again, I will request that your account be blocked. You need to provide a source stating the full results of the elections, not just focussing on one group. Neither the Washington Post nor the Politics Database do this. Number 57 21:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
You're abusing the power that you have as an administrator. The Politics Database does provide full results of the election. The source mentions that the two Shia MPs are part of Shia Islamist political parties. They are part of Shia Islamist political parties, therefore they're part of the Shia group. The Washington Post also confirmed the existence of 10 Shia MPs. -- Onasloga (talk • contribs) 21:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Onasloga: I am not abusing any power I have – if I was, I would have blocked you. You are entering incorrect information into the article – this is about the 2013 elections, but the results you are talking about are from an election afterwards. Unfortunately you seem to have some WP:COMPETENCE issues, so I am going to request a block. Number 57 21:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)