Talk:Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. An image should be in the lead
2. The lead should be broken into a few paragraphs rather than one
3. The sections need to be more divided. For example the treatment section discusses the genetics ( ie that it is autosomal dominate ) and then gives an image.
4. What is the life expectancy?
5. Divide treatment and prognosis into two
6. Images are just placed about. Images of the condiction should all be in the signs and symptoms section maybe in a a gallery.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

1. Appears to have been done
2. no other paragraph breaks within lead
3. agree with division of prognosis and treatment (however the reason genetics was discussed within treatment section was merely a function of the genetic counselling being part of the treatment in deciding to have children)
4. life expectancy is mentioned but without specific numbers in prognosis section, as a function of "live a normal life", however adding the life expectancy would then get into a discussion more of it depending on where the patient is born.
5. agree with this and have done
6. appears to have been done and actually like this approach somewhat better

UnseemlyWeasel (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

GA Sweeps: Kept

I am closing the review on behalf of Jmh649. It appears the issues he raised have been addressed. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

---