Wikipedia

Talk:LGBTQ rights in Mexico

(Redirected from Talk:LGBT rights in Mexico)
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Aleqc in topic Conversion therapies ban (federal)
Learn more about this page

Untitled

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think Gloria Trevi should be mentioned, but not under politics and so much info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.10.96.217 (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Paganism

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See Talk:Homosexuality/Archive12#Mesoamerica for detailed information why the section on Xochiquetzal is wrong.

Well, anonymous editor, I posted that section, using a reputable source, Stephen O. Murray, who has a Ph.D in sociology and post-graduate work in anthropology; you can see his credentials by clicking on his name at the end of the cited glbtq.com article. Now I'm not an expert in pre-Columbian mythology, myself, so I can't swear he is 100% correct on all that, though he does provide a bibliography at the end of the glbtq.com article, which includes among other entries, "Kimball, Geoffrey. "Aztec Homosexuality: The Textual Evidence." Journal of Homosexuality 26.1 (1993): 7-24," which I presume is one of the sources he gets his information from. A google search shows that Kimball's article is widely cited in other scholarly articles on queer studies, so it seems as if Murray is working with good material.
If you have authoritative sources to verify your claims, why don't you add them to this section so readers can form their own judgment about this issue? I really don't care whether there were two gods/goddesses, or ten, or none; but let's put the scholarly evidence out there for everyone to see, okay? Textorus (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article size

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Over the past few weeks I've been working on this article trying to improve it. I think all the required information has been added. However, I think it may be a little too long and I need somebody to tell me if the article is okay the way it currently is, or if it should be split into two articles (like LGBT rights in Japan and LGBT in Japan). Thanks! Kraft. (talk) 09:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Comment. This article is really extensive. Kudos to you for that! But I think perhaps the sections on LGBT life in Mexico (Cutural Life, Tourism, Social Life, etc.) don't really belong in an article on LGBT rights and should instead be an entry like LGBT culture in Mexico. Also, since you have a really detailed accounting of LGBT history here, I would put that in it's own LGBT history in Mexico entry and then edit it down to more of an overview including just what's needed for the context of LGBT rights, with a link back to the full article. Really a great wealth of information, but just too much for one article, IMHO. Viciouslies (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! I just split it into two articles last week. Kraft. (talk) 23:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8425269.stm

I will be adding this information to the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnOicheGhealai (talk • contribs) 03:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

word choices

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I changed the description of areas like Mexico city from "progressive" to "cosmopolitan," because I feel this is a more neutral word that doesn't imply any kind of value judgment. Zujua (talk) 09:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

2+2=5

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"of which 75% were reclaimed by their families; in 10% of the cases families identified the victim but did not reclaim their bodies, which ended up in common graves; and the remaining 5% were never identified."

edit

http://www.animalpolitico.com/2012/12/historico-el-matrimonio-ya-no-es-solo-entre-un-hombre-y-una-mujer/#axzz2ED7l2pgC

CAMPECHE HAS ALREADY APROVE A CIVIL UNION

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://www.revistamidopen.com/2013/12/se-aprueba-en-campeche-las-uniones-civiles-entre-homosexuales/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.147.38.150 (talk) 07:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:State_recognition_of_same-sex_relationships_(North_America).svg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We should probably remove the map if it isn't updated by March 20 (March 20 is when the U.S. State of Kentucky recognizes same-sex marriage). --Prcc27 (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in LGBT rights in Mexico

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of LGBT rights in Mexico's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "hello":

  • From Same-sex marriage in Guerrero: Allan Garcia (10 July 2015). "Acapulco holds mass gay wedding on beach". Agence France-Presse. Raw Story.
  • From LGBT rights in Puerto Rico: Michael Lavers (13 July 2015). "Same-sex couples apply for marriage licenses in Puerto Rico". Washington Blade.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LGBT rights in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on LGBT rights in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on LGBT rights in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on LGBT rights in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Adoption

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article disagrees with the WP-es article. They have some states we don't (e.g. Nayarit), we have some they don't. Could someone better able to evaluate the sources that me bring the two into sync? I also worry that we're not noting adoption for the states that legalized SSM over the past couple years. Did they really all pass marriage without adoption? Ping me if you'd like me to make corrections to the map. — kwami (talk) 20:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Gender identity situation

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In Mexico, some federative entities have officially passed laws, but some others allow legal changes on documentation with a simple administrative procedure without any local 'trans' law.

Some states allow minors to change their documents, while others don't. Supreme Court (which is a very progressive institution in Mexico) have ruled that 6 states must allow minors to change their documents.

That's the reason why in the Spanish version we have a more complex map than the English version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mexico_Transgender_Rights.png

If you like it, you can use it in this version too. Aleqc (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Conversion therapies ban (federal)

edit
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The reform to ban the conversion therapies was published today. They will be criminalised by the Federal Penal Code and the General Health Law.

Here is the link (in Spanish):https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5729935&fecha=07/06/2024#gsc.tab=0 Aleqc (talk) 19:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:LGBTQ_rights_in_Mexico&oldid=1246156521"