Wikipedia

Talk:Lac-Mégantic rail disaster

(Redirected from Talk:Lac-Mégantic derailment)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sadam jamaldin in topic How to an article on Wikipedia
Learn more about this page


edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lac-Mégantic rail disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Lac-Mégantic rail disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Updates needed: convictions

edit

The Trial section only reports on the findings of innocence. The guilty verdicts should be there too. https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/finding-of-guilt-and-guilty-pleas-in-lac-megantic-cases-672781193.html

"Cost cutting"

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I find it difficult to trust an article when it immediately jumps in and starts talking about how it was all the company's fault for their "aggressive cost cutting", in multiple places seeming to imply it was a case of heartless corporate types trying to squeeze a little more profit out by sacrificing safety and required maintenance. The truth is the railroad was desperately trying to stay ALIVE at that point, they were cutting costs because every year of operation was actually costing stockholders millions of dollars. If they couldn't bring costs down under revenues, the only recourse was to shut the whole operation down and lay everyone off. They weren't cutting costs because they wanted to, they were doing it because they were deeply in debt and not bringing in enough from the fees they received to cover present costs of operation. It mentions NONE of this, just the evil Corporate Cost Cutting. Which makes me think the entire article was written by partisans with an axe to grind, so I cannot trust anything I read here.


64.222.125.125 (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Like this

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 "The TSB found that MMA's operating plan was to leave the train parked on the main line, unattended, with an unlocked locomotive cab, alongside a public highway where it was accessible to the general public, with no additional protection.[59] However, there were no rules against leaving a train unlocked, running and unattended, even if it contained dangerous materials and was stopped on the main line, on a slope, in the vicinity of a residential area."

What is this? This is suggesting that someone could just come along and climb aboard and release the brakes or drive off because the locomotive was left running "with an unlocked cab". Railroads routinely do this. It isn't because they are stupid or because they don't care if someone drives off and wrecks millions of dollars worth of equipment, it's because a locomotive cannot be operated without a special key that each engineer carries. Yes, it would be safer to leave someone attending, but they often don't, but it's misleading to suggest this is like leaving a car running beside the highway. Locomotives are designed to be left running. Although when I think of it, if they stopped the train because a locomotive was belching smoke, and then shut down 4 of 5 locomotives, why did they leave the malfunctioning one running? I assume they had their reasons (only the leading engine can control the train?) but it seems strange.

64.222.125.125 (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's normal for trains, yes. The lead engine is the only one that's manned, additional engines rigged as 'helpers' are remotely operated from the lead. 174.127.163.4 (talk) 07:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Musi-Café misplaced on map

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I added a request to see if someone kind and talented could fix it. Brycehughes (talk) 02:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

It has been fixed. Brycehughes (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

General update required

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article needs a significant update. I came here to learn more following listening to this radio article which mentioned the disaster, the recovery and the memorial. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0015vbj I would add the link into the article, but it would be very disjointed from the main article. 92.22.49.238 (talk) 11:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

How to an article on Wikipedia

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello my people, I have encountered a little bit challenge on how I can add an article into Wikipedia, if anyone is aware of it. I need help Sadam jamaldin (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lac-Mégantic_rail_disaster&oldid=1208072637"