Talk:Lafayette–New Iberia–Opelousas combined statistical area

Proposed move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was procedural close. Feel free to get in touch if you think this improper, but not only do we have no consensus here, it's really quite difficult to imagine how we could come to consensus at all. It appears there are at least three questions to answer:

1. Do we capitalize phrases like "Combined Statistical Area"?
2. Do we connect these place names with hyphens or en dashes? Spaced or not?
3. Do we include state names? Abbreviations?

Some of these are easier to answer than others. But it's a tall order to expect consensus on all of these questions for even one of these articles, let alone a large batch. I'm usually not shy about pushing people to use multi-moves when the underlying issue is the same, but it seems clear to me that, given the complexity of the issues involved, these articles are best addressed with baby steps, at least for now. --BDD (talk) 17:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

• Lafayette-Opelousas-Morgan City, LA Combined Statistical Area → Lafayette–Opelousas–Morgan City, LA Combined Statistical Area
• Huntington-Ashland-Ironton metropolitan area → Huntington–Ashland–Ironton metropolitan area
• Chattanooga-Cleveland-Dalton, TN-GA-AL Combined Statistical Area → Chattanooga–Cleveland–Dalton, TN–GA–AL Combined Statistical Area
• Lake Charles – Jennings combined statistical area → Lake Charles–Jennings combined statistical area
• Jackson-Vicksburg-Brookhaven, MS Combined Statistical Area → Jackson–Vicksburg–Brookhaven, MS Combined Statistical Area
• Shreveport – Bossier City – Minden combined statistical area → Shreveport–Bossier City–Minden combined statistical area
• Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC Combined Statistical Area → Greenville–Spartanburg–Anderson, SC Combined Statistical Area
• Huntsville-Decatur-Albertville, AL Combined Statistical Area → Huntsville–Decatur–Albertville, AL Combined Statistical Area
• Denver-Aurora, CO Combined Statistical Area → Denver–Aurora, CO Combined Statistical Area
• Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR Combined Statistical Area → Little Rock–North Little Rock, AR Combined Statistical Area
• Lima – Van Wert – Wapakoneta, OH Combined Statistical Area → Lima–Van Wert–Wapakoneta, OH Combined Statistical Area
• Birmingham-Hoover-Talladega, AL Combined Statistical Area → Birmingham–Hoover–Talladega, AL Combined Statistical Area
• Albuquerque-Santa Fe-Las Vegas, NM Combined Statistical Area → Albuquerque–Santa Fe–Las Vegas, NM Combined Statistical Area
• Las Vegas-Henderson, NV-AZ Combined Statistical Area → Las Vegas–Henderson, NV–AZ Combined Statistical Area
• Findlay-Tiffin, OH Combined Statistical Area → Findlay–Tiffin, OH Combined Statistical Area
• Corbin-London, KY Combined Statistical Area → Corbin–London, KY Combined Statistical Area
• Bend-Redmond-Prineville, OR Combined Statistical Area → Bend–Redmond–Prineville, OR Combined Statistical Area
• Corpus Christi – Kingsville combined statistical area → Corpus Christi–Kingsville combined statistical area
• Fort Polk South – DeRidder combined statistical area → Fort Polk South–DeRidder combined statistical area
• Columbus – West Point combined statistical area → Columbus–West Point combined statistical area
• El Paso-Las Cruces, TX-NM Combined Statistical Area → El Paso–Las Cruces, TX–NM Combined Statistical Area
• Albany-Corvallis-Lebanon, Oregon Combined Statistical Area → Albany–Corvallis–Lebanon, Oregon Combined Statistical Area
• Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Metropolitan Statistical Area → Harrisburg–Carlisle, PA Metropolitan Statistical Area
• Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area → Youngstown–Warren–Boardman, OH–PA Metropolitan Statistical Area
• North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Florida Metropolitan Statistical Area → North Port–Sarasota–Bradenton, Florida Metropolitan Statistical Area
• Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area → Denver–Aurora–Lakewood, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area
• Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR Metropolitan Statistical Area → Little Rock–North Little Rock–Conway, AR Metropolitan Statistical Area
• Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC Metropolitan Statistical Area → Greenville–Anderson–Mauldin, SC Metropolitan Statistical Area
• Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area → Birmingham–Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area
• Chattanooga, TN-GA Metropolitan Statistical Area → Chattanooga, TN–GA Metropolitan Statistical Area

– There is no reason for these compounds to have a form of punctuation stronger than an en dash. En dashes should also not be spaced when connecting compounds. It'd also be great if we could decide before this proposal is closed, whether MSA/CSA need to be capitalized. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Comment: The dashes and hyphens are just a minor detail in the larger issue of how metropolitan/micropolitan area articles and categories should be named. The topic has consumed a lot of "ink" in recent months at pages that include Talk:Statistical area, Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 February 24, Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_March_4#Metropolitan_areas_in_the_United_States, and Talk:List of metropolitan areas of the United States. (There have been other discussions; I haven't looked them all up.) IMO, it does not serve the encyclopedia reader when there are separate articles for every federal definition of a metro area, complete with the two-letter state abbreviations that aren't meaningful to most people outside the US (and some inside the country), with title changes every few years when the OMB tweaks these names. MSAs, CSAs, NECTAs, μSAs, etc., all represent different ways to formally define the somewhat amorphous concept of a metropolitan area. A good encyclopedia would have one article about the metropolitan area, including various ways it is currently conceptualized and defined, both this year and in the past. The article title should resemble a common name for the area, not this year's official OMB term.

Consistent with the above philosophy, I have merged the two separate articles about the Birmingham, Alabama, metro area and renamed the combined article Birmingham, Alabama metropolitan area, so I struck through the move requests for those two articles. Similar changes could be made to several of the other items on the above list. --Orlady (talk) 14:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose and suggest withdrawal and resubmission. Which is correct, Combined Statistical Area or combined statistical area? So while addressing other issues it does not address this problem. Yea, it asks the question, but I think adding that as a discussion question does not help reach agreement the nominator should propose one based on past discussions. I agree with some of the concerns expressed by Orlady, but if we are going to do simple cleanup while those issues exist, then we should work towards fixing as much as we can in one nomination. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:17, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm secretly in the capitalize-as-proper-nouns camp but I wouldn't want something as trivial as that to divide the consensus. I agree though that ideally this should be resolved with as few intermediate moves as possible. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 00:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

• Query: Are we sure it should be "Albuquerque–Santa Fe–Las Vegas" and not "Albuquerque – Santa Fe – Las Vegas"? The latter is much more readable. Powers ^T 22:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

MOS:ENDASH: "The en dash in all of the compounds above is unspaced." It would also most closely resemble the usage given by reliable sources. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 00:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

When the heck did that rule change? Unspacing the hyphens makes it hard to visually delineate the entities being conjoined. Powers ^T 00:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose - as noted above and elsewhere, these are ridiculously long titles and there are more issues than just dashes:

1. Lafayette-Opelousas-Morgan City CSA would be precise enough, since the lead can be rewritten to state that this is a CSA in Louisiana; the same principle should apply to all of the others in this list, with CSA or MSA as appropriate;
2. we don't need the "state codes" beause we are not disambiguating, are we?
3. put these articles in the woefully underpopulated Category:Combined statistical areas of the United States and Category:Metropolitan statistical areas of the United States as appropriate. Green Giant (talk) 04:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

• Comment – yes on the dash fixes, but let's get the case right while we're at it. These are descriptive titles, not proper names, so the "combined statistical area" parts should be lowercase. I don't think there would be any controversy in just going ahead and fixing those. There is still the open question of whether we want articles on statistical areas at all, or whether "metropolitan area" would be a more suitable title in most cases. Dicklyon (talk) 12:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

• Comment: An RFC on the inclusion of state names in the titles of articles about US metropolitan areas just closed with the result that state names are not normally required. Let's not try to revisit that discussion in this discussion of a small subset of metro area articles. --Orlady (talk) 16:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
  • So are you suggesting that there might be support to change the dash/hyphen, lower casing the combined statistical area and dropping the state (except for the multi state articles) should be where consensus is on this discussion? At the moment, I would not object to that since it addresses errors that need to be fixed. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
    • Since I'm feeling curmudgeonly, I'll tell you what I'm thinking. I absolutely don't care about the hyphens and dashes (but I recognize that there are valid reasons for fussing about them) and I'm still bothered by the existence of multiple articles for the Chattanooga, Denver, Greenville, and Little Rock metropolitan areas, as well as the general inconsistency in these titles (such as the inconsistency in capitalizing or not capitalizing "combined statistical area"). As for state identifiers I don't know why we would keep the state postal abbreviations for the multi-state articles, but drop them for the areas that are all in one state. I don't believe any of these titles needs to include a state name, much less a postal abbreviation. My preference would be to not rename the articles until there's a consensus about all aspects of the titles, as I expect that we'll be back at RM a few weeks from now, fussing about some of these same titles all over again. --Orlady (talk) 04:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
      • If states in the multi state ones is the only hang up, then I can live without them. As you say, we need to get to one standard. If this is a start, then let it rip. Like you I generally avoid the short vertical line things and whether or not they need spaces and so on. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Orlady, I believe you meant to link here. The link you provided was another RfC against the misbegotten USPLACE. I'm biased, but I think the result from the metro area RfC further demonstrates the deficiencies of USPLACE. --BDD (talk) 16:58, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Map / Morgan City

Morgan City is in St. Mary Parish, which is not reddened. The eight central Acadiana parishes are: Acadia, Evangeline, Iberia, Lafayette, St. Landry, St. Martin, St. Mary, & Vermilion.99.195.14.197 (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC) sorry, wasn't logged in --BooksXYZ (talk) 15:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)