Talk:Lao royal family
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title change
editTitle needs to be changed to Lao Royal Family.Inthavbo (talk) 05:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
- Done. Yes, "Laotian" is not as appropriate as "Lao", and this is the most common name. Night w (talk) 06:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Merge articles?
editNew to the process, but a quick observation shows that there is similar information at the Royal Lao Government page. Should these two articles be combined? Cam Vilay (talk) 06:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
No, they should be separate. One was a legitimate government whereas this entry appears to be a self promotion by a group claiming legitimacy to the throne (which is contested). Mell.ning (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Biased
editThis article is biased and requires extensive historical research and citations, there are inadequate references as to the legitimacy of the information and it appears to come from a non-credible source rather then a site run by unknown. (Mell.ning (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC))