Talk:Law in action

Why University of Wisconsin?

I suggest removing the University of Wisconsin template. The University of Wisconsin may have been leading in this field some time ago (at least in the U.S.), and the cites giving credit to this fact are more or less accurate, but there are quite a few few more universities world wide researching and teaching law in action, so there is no need to have that special template, is there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coracle RSA (talk • contribs) 15:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Law in action. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060210100632/http://www.law.wisc.edu/Davislawinactionessay.htm to http://www.law.wisc.edu/Davislawinactionessay.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)