Talk:Lawrence Weathers
(Redirected from Talk:Lawrence Carthage Weathers)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Pippu d'Angelo in topic Small observation
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lawrence Weathers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Lawrence Weathers is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 2, 2019. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or added to during the Victoria Cross Reference Migration. It may contain material that was used with permission from victoriacross.net. |
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
New Zealand born troops serving for Australia
editThere is some confusion as to whether they should appear on the Australian and New Zealand list. They should appear on both lists. Wallie (talk) 10:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Small observation
editJust noticed that this sentence: "As of 2007, his Victoria Cross was in private hands." appears at the end of the 2nd para and again at the very end of the article, not sure if that's intentional, probably doesn't need to be repeated twice. πιππίνυ δ - (dica) 09:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your interest! Hope you enjoyed reading the article. The way it works, anything in the lead section (the bit at the top) has to be based on what is in the body (the rest), and the bit in the body has to be footnoted to the source of the info. That is quite standard on Wikipedia. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for explaining. I did enjoy it. πιππίνυ δ - (dica) 11:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)