Talk:Le Hardi-class destroyer
Le Hardi-class destroyer has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 16, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Naming
editThis page was moved a while ago, without discussion or explanation, and the ship names edited, to remove the definite article from Le Hardi and several of the others. I have reverted this, as there was no justification for it. All the sources on the page (and I have now added some more) list these vessels as having names (or 8 of the 16 names used, anyway) with the definite article. If anyone has a source that says differently, I suggest they bring it here, as it may warrant a footnote informing of the difference; but the weight of evidence is for the names to be as they were originally written. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Adroit-class destroyer which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Moved
editI've gone ahead and moved this to "Le Hardi class destroyer", per WP:TITLE, so that it matches the name in the article and the sources here. It also reverses the unexplained move in December 2008, which has not been verified in any of the discussions linked here. If anyone has a verifiable source that supports the contested name ("Hardi class"), without the definite article, I would be interested to see it; there is a discussion here for the purpose. Xyl 54 (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Le Hardi-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120911152705/http://www.warshipsww2.eu/lode.php?language=E&period=&idtrida=261 to http://www.warshipsww2.eu/lode.php?language=E&period=&idtrida=261
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)