Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lê Văn Duyệt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Lê Văn Duyệt has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Naming
editI've just redirected the page from Le Van Duyet to Lê Văn Duyệt, only because the latter is more appropriate for a proper Vietnamese name, it doesn't affect in any way the quality of the article. Grenouille vert (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Minor question: is the "goddes" mentioned in the Family and personal life section supposed to be "goddess?" Also, in the Conflict section, there's the word "rorting;" is that a typo as well (or just something I'm not familiar with)?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Images all look good.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Excellent work on this article, which is quite interesting to read. There's just a couple typos and the one missing footnote holding the article up from passing. I made a series of edits to the article, you might want to check and make sure everything is correct. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- a Pass/Fail:
- Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, everything looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Intersex??
editIs it appropriate to classify the subject as intersex? He was a eunuch, but that isn't the same thing. AuntFlo (talk) 12:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- He naturally born intersex. Due to that reason, he became an eunuch. I have stated this point clearly in the note section.--AM (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
move talk page
edit{{admin help}} Hi. Can someone move this talk page so it matches up with the articles name. AIRcorn (talk) 23:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)