Talk:Legion season 1/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 22:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

I actually watched the entire first season. Having never edited or read the Wikipedia article before, I'll look it over for a while before posting up a review later. Sagecandor (talk) 22:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 14, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: This article page, or shall we say list page, or both, is very very very very good. What a pleasure. The lede is of appropriate size and correctly introduces the reader to the subject as well as functioning as a good summary, per WP:LEAD. The writing style is "clear and concise", per WP:WIAGA good article criteria 1a. The episode summaries are good. The article contains an extensive amount of research that is most impressive indeed.

2. Verifiable?: Everything on the page is cited. The season episode summaries are matter of fact wording only and thus okay per WP:PLOTSUMMARY.

3. Broad in coverage?: The article is indeed quite thorough, covering subjects including Introduction, Episodes, Cast and characters, Main, Recurring, Production, Development, Writing, Casting, Design, Filming, Music, Visual effects, Shared universe connections, Release, Broadcast, Marketing, Reception, Ratings, Critical response, Accolades. One award appears to be pending in the Accolades section but that is okay as the article is stable.

4. Neutral point of view?: Article meets NPOV. Written in a neutral tone. As noted, above, even the episode descriptions are matter of fact wording only.

5. Stable? Article edit history is stable going back the last 50 edits. No talk page problems to speak of.

6. Images?: 5 images used. 3 free use licensed and licenses are all okay. File:Murphy's Suspension of Disbelief.gif - this one the nominator should get on fixing as soon as possible, but I'm going to say it's okay to do for something to improve further. Infobox image is File:Legion season 1 poster.jpg good. Both fair use have strong fair use rationales.

Great job, excellent research and effort !!! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the review Sage! I will get onto that image straight away. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)