Questioning a source

edit

The article gives the opinion of Adam Burgess on Lennart Hardell's work, but his specialty is the social impact of mobile telephones, not the physics ones. He's a sociologist of risk, studying things like the influence of states on perceived health risks from mobile phone, or the use of mobile phones in hospitals. He has absolutely no authority in judging epistemological validity of biological research, and the article lack clarity about that point. The Burgess' text quoted is merely an advertising for his book : he did 3 articles on the subject in "spiked", then vanished. In what world is "spiked" a source ? Does anyone had really read this book ? Anyway I let it be, for now, waiting other point of views. https://www.spiked-online.com/2005/01/20/dial-a-scare/ https://www.kent.ac.uk/social-policy-sociology-social-research/people/566/