Talk:Les Paul

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2600:1700:8671:A3C0:C8A3:1ECD:8258:3D93 in topic The Log

First solid-body electric

edit
In 1941, Paul designed and built the first solid-body electric guitar.
I think Fender had a solid body electric guitar design submitted to them at the same time. I'm not sure, but I definitely remember reading that someone else had independantly invented it too. -- Jimregan 04:35 27 May 2003 (UTC)

It was Leo Fender, I think. The Broadcaster was released around the same time, and I think it was invented around the same time. -- Jimregan 04:38 27 May 2003 (UTC)

No one really knows who invented the first one but Fender definitely developed the first commercially viable solid body in the late 1940s. Ted McCarty of Gibson saw the potential, wanted Gibson's market share and this led to the Gibson Les Paul.--Phyllis1753 (talk) 12:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The "Chester and Lester" album was released in 1976. It had a follow-up album "Guitar Monsters" in 1978.
The page says that Les Paul's 1947 recording of "Lover, When You're Near Me" was the first time multi-tracking had been used on a recording." Not true. On April 18, 1941, Sidney Bechet recorded "The Sheik of Araby," playing all the instruments and overdubbing them -- soprano and tenor sax, clarinet, piano, bass, and drums. There may have been others.
"Recorded on WAX". Most unlikely. Wax recordings couldn't be played back - only used as masters. "Instant" recordings were aluminum disks covered with acetate and they could be played a limited number of times without serious degradation. Glass was used instead of aluminum when the WW2 war effort required the aluminum. 24Aug06

Death

edit

i am positive les paul died some time this year. I just don't know when. does somebody know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.253.83.8 (talkcontribs)

You are positively incorrect. Les Paul is still ticking, and picking, I believe at the tender age of 91. PJM 00:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Several years ago, I saw a televised birthday tribute to Les Paul on television in the US. Many top guitarists played solos, including Steve Miller, Eddie Van Halen, and particularly David Gilmour, at who Les stared wide-eyed and said "Boy, you sure play your ass off!" He actually seemed stunned by David's performance, which was a tremendous solo along the lines of David's typical style. I can never find that show or performance referenced. Does anyone remember it and where can we get it?Joe House (talk) 04:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

You probably mean "Les Paul & Friends: He Changed the Music" from 1988. It's available from amazon http://www.amazon.com/Paul-Friends-He-Changed-Music/dp/6302373611 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.194.181 (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Uh, he died today.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.209.246.225 (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Friendship with Django Reinhardt

edit

This article makes no mention of his friendship with Django Reinhardt, which caused him to shift his musical focus from country to jazz and pop.

What's up with the pictures on this page?

edit

They show an X-box for Les and a silhouette of a tree for "the log".

Ok, pictures back to normal now.

Birthdate?

edit

The article says June 9, 1915, but the infobox says June 7, 1914. Whazzup? 199.126.161.143 23:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Divorce/Les Paul website

edit

I am removing the word "amicably" from the article's reference to the 1964 divorce from Mary Ford for one reason: the official biography on Paul's own site (http://www.lespaulonline.com/bio.html) describes the divorce as "bitter." Sensei48 22:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Sensei48Reply

== Radio talk ==feafaf

"To this day, no one knows exactly how the Les Paulverizer works." I would think that Mr. Les Paul WOULD be the one to know EXACTLY how the Les Paulverizer works!!! 00:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Troubleshooter5300:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Troubleshooter53

Quote at top

edit

OK here's the thing. The page currently says "Apple Inc. recognizes him as 'one of the most important figures in the development of modern electric musical instruments and recording techniques.'" But on apple.com/hotnews, it says "Wikipedia recognizes him as 'one of the most important figures in the development of modern electric musical instruments and recording techniques.'" The fact that I think Apple should not be quoting Wikipedia as a source for this sort of thing aside, who wrote this quote first?!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.175.1 (talkcontribs)

Further, the source that the footnote links to does not contain the quotation! Apple's startpage does but won't forever. I'll glance through the history to see if I can figure out what's goin' on.  — gogobera (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
What a bizarre case of circular referencing. The statement has been around pretty much from the Wikipedia article's conception, and an IP decides to attribute the claim to Apple, and uses a wrong link. Even then, as noted above, the page where the claim was made actually traces the claim to Wikipedia. Quite embarrassing for both websites, if you ask me. Dancter 20:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, an anon edit added, [[Apple]], fixed it to [[Apple Inc.]], and then added the reference link. It's either a somewhat creative vandal or an editor who doesn't quite get the idea of sourcing. Since the editor claims to have "fixed an error" by adding Apple, I lead toward the former. Either way, it's time to go back to how things were. — gogobera (talk) 20:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Linkspam?

edit

Someone added a comment about the Iridium jazz club (the ONLY place to see Les Paul these days -- his Monday gig is not only well known but quite an accomplishment at age 93). It got reverted for lack of a source. So I added a link to a page that has tons of content. Not linkspam, since the whole point was to provide support for text someone ELSE added! What happened to assuming good faith? Oblivy (talk) 03:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's a non-notable club, which would make it linkspam. However, Katharineamy makes the excellent point that it shows he is still performing at 93, which is notable. Edward321 (talk) 23:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I moved the information up into the section that already talked about the iridium gig (which maybe should have been done in the first place). Think this is a reasonable resolution, but feel free to disagree/change.Oblivy (talk) 02:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll weigh in that this gig is worthwhile information for inclusion. Even if the subject were to die tomorrow, the fact that he maintained a regular nightly public gig into his 90s would deserve inclusion, and I think it would be informative rather than commercial to mention which club the gig was in. A number of other notable musicians have come to see Paul perform at Iridium Nightclub, e.g. Paul McCartney. Robert K S (talk) 18:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Couple of things..

edit

First, I noticed some weasel words in the text, but as I haven't been editing the article, I left it alone. Second, shouldn't the Epiphone company get more than a sentence mention? Gibson has a big part in the guitar, but aside from Epiphone makes models that are cheaper (or something like that), there's no real mention. I couldn't figure out what to do with some signature Les Paul guitars, like the Slash 2008 Gold body Les Paul. I put it in the Honors section, since I couldn't figure out what else to do with it. Can someone help with that? Thanks. --leahtwosaints (talk) 10:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I believe that the Slash sections you added don't have a relevance to Les Paul. Also, those sections were repetitive, poorly written and sounded promotional to me. That material, in a more trim and slim format, would be appropriate at the Slash page or the Epiphone page, but not here at Les Paul. I removed the sections. Binksternet (talk) 12:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Birth name

edit

"His birth name [of Polfuss] was first simplified by his mother to Polfuss". Eh? Isidore (talk) 20:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, it says at the top of the article he was born Polsfuss, with an s, so I guess the first sentence in the Biography section: "He was born in Waukesha, Wisconsin to George and Evelyn Polfuss.[2]" has a typo. Reference [2] only talks about Polfuss, though. Isidore (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

This was a time where surname spelling was not set in stone and many immigrants simplified their names over the years. If the mother did it, she got her in-laws to change their name, too. Questors (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Les Paulveriser

edit

The short section on this, I believe, needs a rewrite. The more research I do on this subject the more I come to the conclusion that the whole thing was an elaborate fake/hoax. The 2 commonly seen video clips (both on youtube), when examined carefully, show quite clearly that the phrases he plays are actually nothing like the phrases that play back to him afterwards. Take the "drumming" he does on the guitar strings. This actually starts partway through the phrase but when the "Les Paulveriser" plays it back, the drumming starts immediately, ie right at the beginning of the phrase.

Also, the chords he plays are slightly different from what gets played back.

In one particular section the "device" starts to play back before he has swtiched it on!

In one invertew Mr Paul almost (seemingly) admits that the "invention" was device used to *explain* how he could play 2 guitar parts at once, as opposed to a device to actually allow this to happen.

I don't wish to take anything way from Mr Paul as he did a lot regarding the initial introduction of the instrument (guitar) but I think this matter needs clearing up.

Anyone up to the task? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.32.120.42 (talk) 16:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've rewritten it to reflect the fact that it is actually a hoax and that the device didn't actually exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.88.175 (talk) 09:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I see this section is back stating the device exists and even to how it worked but no citations. It did NOT exist. The technology simply did not exist in those days. Another Wikipedia "fact" joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.222.8 (talk) 10:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Big Band & Jazz Hall of Fame Foundation

edit

I took out the mention of Paul being inducted into the Big Band & Jazz Hall of Fame Foundation's Big Band & Jazz Hall of Fame in 1990. This organization, based in the relatively empty north half of San Diego County, California, is not prominent enough to make their recognition of Paul noteworthy. To me, it looks like an active big band grew out of the foundation or vice versa, muddying the waters regarding what the org's mission is. Are they about getting gigs and preserving the big band experience or are they about hosting awards ceremonies and reaching out with education about the inductees? I don't know. The band's current website, bigbandjazzorch.org is a recognizable descendant of the Foundation's old website but there is no longer any mention of the Hall of Fame. It appears as if they stopped supporting the institution.

Just in case anybody wants to see who else this non-profit org nominated for their Hall of Fame, here's an archived list of inductees from 1978 to 2004, a snapshot from 2005 near the end of the domain's usage by them. Their old URL, www.jazzhall.org, was lost to a domain squatter, so only the archived versions of the old website are available.

Bottom line is, I don't think this particular Hall of Fame is a strong enough entry for placement here on the Les Paul page. Binksternet (talk) 01:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Needs work badly

edit

This article is full of hear-say and uncited material.It should be cleaned up or pulled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.115.212 (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.32.102.55 (talk) 02:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Section with quotes from others

edit

I deleted this section added by Master of Puppets, as it is not encyclopedic standing alone as it does, and against the hidden note at the top of the section, the quotes are not actually necessary to establish Paul's notability. Any of the quotes that people would like to keep should be worked into other sections where the presence of the quote makes sense chronologically or in terms of subject matter. Binksternet (talk) 02:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

They're not there to establish his notability, but the notability of his death. How else do you suggest we gauge public reaction to this? There are barely any articles on it or interviews with celebrities. The quotes are the only information we've got. Though next time it would probably be a better idea to check here first before deleting... :P Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
What is the "notability of his death"? The best way to use these quotes is to work them into article text, to wrap contextual prose around the ones that have a context. Binksternet (talk) 03:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Work them into the article text? How? You'd turn it into an obituary if you did. The quotes will be gone after we've got enough material for a sturdier section; for now, they're needed (and aren't standing alone) to establish reaction to his death. Without them it seems like nobody's responded. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
How is it not an obituary with the quotes? Binksternet (talk) 03:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
As I've said before, the quotes are the only thing right now we have in the sense of the reaction of the community. You'll find them in every magazine or newspaper press release. They're inevitable because it happened today. Not including them seems silly, to me at least. Also, if they're only in one section then they're not filling up the whole article. We'll remove them after a few days. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm not down with an addition that is intended to last only a short while. I'm no fan of recentism—I try to edit for the long haul. I don't think we need a sense of the reaction of the community to his death. Instead, we should have more of people's responses to what he did in life. Binksternet (talk) 03:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

It wouldn't be recentism - his death, and community reaction to it, is encyclopedic and important to note. Again, the usage of quotes would be best. We can improve the life section, too, of course. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Anyone could quell an argument regarding is notability in general by drawing one's attention to the fact that many people "invented" and "built" and "played" solid body electric guitars and experimented with overdubbing and multitracking long before Les Paul did, he was merely one of the first who were noticed through making it commercially viable/successful/popular. There are countless others who unarguably did far more for SBEGs and recording techniques than he. Nick carson (talk) 12:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
There's nothing talking about whether he invented them or proving his notability in this section... Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 14:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
As a further reply to Binksternet; notice the very prominent usage of quotes in news publications right now as the only view of gauging artist tribute; BBC News and NME, for example. Every other publication just gives a history of his life, which is dandy and everything, but there's no attention paid to the reaction to his death and how this is affecting things. Unless I've gone insane, I think that's got encyclopedic importance. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 14:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Children

edit

Why no mention of his offspring? He had four kids, two of whom he had with his first wife Virginia, who is also unmentioned. -- 98.221.131.77 (talk) 03:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Born/died symbols

edit

Why is there an asterisk and a cross in this article's born/died line? (* June 9, 1915; † August 13, 2009) I have not changed it since I am unsure if it actually means anything beyond someone's effort to emphasize the dates. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I believe that the cross is a traditional European way of denoting DoD--Phyllis1753 (talk) 12:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia convention is" (b June 9, 1915; d August 13, 2009). Nick carson (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
English Wikipedia convention is (June 9, 1915 - August 13, 2009). Information yes (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tributes in 'death' section

edit

This information is irrelevant, one can be assured there are many guitarists out there sending tributes via all sorts of mechanisms, why should we focus on Rolling Stone Magazine as the medium and the famous guitarists listed as the tributaries? This is very nearly merely blatant advertising and I have removed the content. Nick carson (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, Rolling Stone is a premier and internationally-recognized source for music news. That's not advertising, that's fact, and that's why we accept it as a reliable source. You could use any other source (in fact, I did) in the same manner, though; I just chose Rolling Stone to further signify the notability. People are very keen on reading into things these days, aren't they? :P Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 14:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Illness

edit

"His attorney stated to the media that Paul had been "in and out of the hospital at least 9000 times" because of illness." - so this means he had been in and out of hospital OVER 9000 times... -- Jimbo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.199.252 (talk) 13:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hall of Fame

edit

The article claims that Paul and Ford were inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame in 1978, but from what I've been able to find, the HoF is for specific recordings, not people. The duo are in with "How High the Moon", but that's in 1979. Am I missing something? Clarityfiend (talk) 01:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ancestry

edit

The article currently states that Paul was Jewish, using this website source, but I don't think it's all that reliable - dated August 13, 2009, the writer could well have just copied the Wikipedia page (and I don't see any older sources state that Paul was Jewish). The 2003 book "Famous Wisconsin Musicians" by Susan Masino (and with a forward by Paul himself) mentions Paul's attendance at church socials (Pg. 9-11). It also states that his mother was related to the founders of Stutz Bearcat and Valentin Blatz, founder of the Valentin Blatz Brewing Company, who wasn't Jewish. I think Paul was just of non-Jewish German background (the fairly long family history here doesn't mention a Jewish background). All Hallow's (talk) 04:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2009/08/a-blast-goodbye-to-les-paul/

There are many refs from jewish sources as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.212.90.254 (talk) 19:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your cite only says that the father was "Prussian" and emigrated to the US via Germany. He may or may nothave been Jewish. His mother probably wasn't Jewish, but about the father---who knows!

The cite you removed said "Lester William Polsfuss, the son of a Jewish-Prussian family in Wisconsin." Stop removing citations. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 13:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Log

edit

I heard a description of this on NPR yesterday, and was hoping to find an image of it here. Is it worthy of an image, given it was his first Solid body guitar? ThuranX (talk) 06:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Absolutely. It was the first electric guitar, period, I believe. If a usable image can be found, it would improve the article. Jusdafax (talk) 22:42, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

What? It wasn't the first electric guitar by many, many years. It was almost a decade after other companies were already selling them in shops never mind messing around trying to get one working. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.121.202 (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Log, as of May 2018, is located on display at the Country Music Hall of Fame in Nashville. I took pics while there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:8671:A3C0:C8A3:1ECD:8258:3D93 (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Order of Names

edit

Why is Slash listed before rock legends like Jimmy Page and Pete Townshend in this article? That just looks silly - like it was written by somebody with a Slash agenda.

59.97.64.88 (talk) 09:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)GDReply

Rolling Stone accolade

edit

I added Les Paul's inclusion in Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time as a tribute only to see it immediately reverted as "too promotional." However, I see a clear indication herein (re quotes from the magazine upon his death) that Rolling Stone is a recognized and respected source. On this basis, and because I find it significant, I will reinsert the statement (slightly reworded) within the next hour or so unless I see a better argument against it on this page in the interim. 99.246.28.112 (talk) 01:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Here's a six-week-old thread that was my basis for taking out your recent addition: Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_June_12. Many of the arguments expressed apply here. Nothing personal, man. Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 01:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Death

edit

I deleted the list of tributes because the three articles cited did not support at least 8 names (out of 23) including Townshend, Clapton, Page, Anastasio, May, and The Edge. I haven't checked them all, but this list has become a magnet for random namedropping (as in today's Zakk Wylde tag). If I'm mistaken please let me know. The articles do support the quotes so I moved them. Oblivy (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good move. :-)
Binksternet (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Date of Death

edit

Les Paul's date of death has been an issue over time on his page, but editors seem to have settled on August 12th based on the official website [[1]] and a photo of the brass plate on his coffin. The problem seems to be that the New York Times obituary gives his date of death as "Thursday [August 13th]." [[2]] I think the 12th is the right date, but wanted to make a note in light of the recent edit by User:66.189.178.14 and reversion. Oblivy (talk) 14:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Additional support for date of death as August 12: Les Paul Foundation (set up by Les Paul) -- "August 12 is the second anniversary of the passing of the original guitar hero, Les Paul." [1] CNN -- "anniversary of Les Paul's death on August 12" [2] Oblivy (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

Broken Records Paragraph

edit

Noted the new paragraph on a broken records interview. This doesn't seem to fit wikipedia's standards, for a few reasons including (1) non-notable publication, (2) no citation/verification of the "last cover story," and (3) written like an advert for the article. It's also misplaced in the article. Am considering removing from the article but would like to give others a chance to weigh in first. Oblivy (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Missing text?

edit

There's a clear missing paragraph in the Guitar Builder section, between the first and second para.... when did Gibson morph from "no interest" into "the arrangement persisted"? I don't know the answer else I'd fix it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.151.8 (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

incomplete sentence

edit

"Paul was the of rock guitarist Steve Miller of the Steve Miller Band, to whom Paul gave his first guitar lesson."[66]

I'm not sure what the contributor is trying to say here, but it doesnt make sense. Paul was the ??? of rock guitarist? Jtagchair (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC).Reply


Les Paul did not invent the 8-track recorder

edit

I have just rewritten the multi-track recording section of the Les Paul page to correct a popular myth that Les Paul commissioned Ampex to build the original 8-track recorder. He did not even if he liked to tell the story. If you read:

[Sel-sync and the "Octopus": How Came to be the First Recorder to Minimize Successive Copying in Overdubs]

You will see that Ampex came up with the idea and shopped it around and Les Paul was the only person to respond:

"... Walter Goldsmith ... sent proposals for such a machine to as many as twelve recording artists. Bob's memory is that only Paul responded at first"

(Third to last paragraph on page 211)

Robert.Harker (talk) 00:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Roger Nichols Photo

edit

I question whether this photo adds anything to the Les Paul page. Nichols' page does include the photo of Les so it would still be available online. Is there a material working or personal connection between the two? This page doesn't mention him, and Nichols' page doesn't mention Les Paul. Oblivy (talk) 09:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

The connection, as the photo of Les Paul and Roger Nichols notes in the included caption, is that both have been awarded the unusual and highly notable audio honor of the Special Merit/Technical Grammy Award - awarded to very few people, including Leo Fender, Geoff Emerick, Tom Dowd, Ray Dolby and even Thomas Alva Edison. Some got the award while still living and some, like Edison, Dowd and Nichols, were awarded this rare Grammy posthumously. I placed the photo way down in the article in the awards section, since it seemed appropriate there, also in a section of the article with few photos in either direction. Naturally, if consensus is reached here on removing the photo on the grounds that it doesn't "add anything", that can be done. Given that I have worked on both men's articles (this article's third paragraph in the lead is my contribution), it seemed like a nice touch. The last photo in Les Paul's WP article is one of him with a pianist whose Wikipedia article has been tagged as needing sources for several years, as it seems to only have one. Should we ask if this photo should be removed as well? He is not mentioned in the article either. Jusdafax 11:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
John Colianni is mentioned earlier in the article (there are two spellings, resulting in an inconsistency in the article at the moment). He was Les's accompanist during his gigs at the Iridium. Moreover, the photo clearly showcases Les in a happy and vital moment.Oblivy (talk) 16:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I do see Les Paul's late career musical sideman mentioned on second look, but you fail to discuss the merits of my argument about the Technical Grammy Award both Nichols and Les Paul have received for their work. I say it suits the "Awards" section of the Les Paul article just fine. As for "happy and vital", while it is not clear exactly where the shot I have posted was taken, the ID badge Nichols is wearing indicates it is an industry trade show of some kind, and Paul looks happy there too, for what it's worth. Additionally, I find the new photo has considerable value as the only shot of Paul standing post-accident without a guitar, showing clearly the permanent angle his arm was set at. But enough. Happy to await consensus on the photo you question. We obviously disagree, so let us await fresh views. Jusdafax 21:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for responding. If the goal is to highlight how special it is that Les Paul won a special grammy award, maybe that can be done in the text? It would put the photo into context.Oblivy (talk) 03:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done Thanks, I have framed the Tech Grammy largely with the Recording Academy's own description. It seems a clear improvement to the section to me; see what you think. Happy to work on it further if you like, but I think it has a good balance now. Jusdafax 09:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Guitar Builder Changes

edit

I cut the second half of the first sentence in this section. It claimed Paul made significant contributions to the design. He did not. Depending on the source, he had from two to zero design contributions. One was supposedly the tail piece, and another the operating direction of the bridge/neck pickup selector switch. Other "contributions" were only cosmetic, such as his suggestion to make it black "like a tuxedo" because it would look "more expensive". The zero contribution comes from Ted McCarty, designer of the instrument and president of Gibson, and relates to the second part of the edited line. The last statement was that the guitar was named "in his honor". It was not. It was named for him as a commercial endorsement for which he received payment. Using someone's name in order to profit yourself and them is not doing so in their honor. McCarty claimed this arrangement was Paul's sole "contribution". Discussion of the contributions and my justification for this edit come from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson_Les_Paul Should the referenced material be further refined, so should this section.

I added a paragraph at the end of this section, regarding Paul being the developer of the headless guitar. This was rewritten from (and references) the Les Paul Foundation's history pages. It includes a link to Steinberger guitars. Although it references a commercial entity and ignores other companies that have produced guitars of this design, in the absence of a generic "headless guitar" page, it is the best description of headless guitars available here. And it is used because the Steinberger is, as stated in the added material, the most successful development of the design.

Drmcclainphd (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Weird sentence flow

edit

"Frustrated with the quality of most hearing aids, he set to work designing his own custom unit and was still at the job when he passed away. Undaunted, he continued to perform through his disabilities while making some compromises such as playing at slower tempos and using an extra-large guitar pick that he could grip more easily."

Takes a special kind of person to be undaunted by death :D

124.157.109.94 (talk) 04:38, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done I fixed it with parenthesis and a paragraph break. Thanks, good catch. Jusdafax 05:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article and lead layout

edit

I'm a bit perplexed by the lead and overall structure of the article. I consider myself someone who is well read when it comes to the history of guitars, especially electric guitars. I wouldn't have bothered with opening this article if it weren't for a tangent (common story). Anyways, the first sentence of the lead fails to lay the groundwork to inform the reader that Paul is widely considered the "father of the electric guitar". Including his styles up front dilutes the significance of his legendary status as a pioneer. Consider this from Encyclopedia.com as better example:

American guitarist and inventor Les Paul (born 1915) was responsible for a significant portion of the technical apparatus of contemporary popular music. He invented multitrack recording and overdubbing, using those techniques for the first time in 1947; within a few years they were essential to hundreds of popular record releases, and most popular song recordings are inconceivable without them today. Paul also pioneered other recording sound effects such as reverb, delay, and phase shifting. He was among the first developers of the solid-body electric guitar, which went on to become the defining instrument of rock and roll, and he designed the Gibson Les Paul, one of the two dominant electric guitar makes of the classic rock era. As a recording artist, Paul and his wife, Mary Ford, enjoyed a run of popularity in the late 1940s and early 1950s. In the words of former Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page, as quoted in a Melody Maker interview appearing on the Web site of the Rock and Roll Journal, Paul was “the man who started everything. He's just a genius.”

1000 years from now, someone reading Wikipedia's article won't have a clue as to his importance to the genre of modern 20th century pop music.That man from Nantucket (talk) 03:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you read through the above discussions you'll notice that there is usually pretty hard evidence being put forward that Les Paul didn't invent half as much as that quote would like people to believe. For example with multitrack recording and with the solid body guitar, it seems to me, while Les Paul certainly made contributions to the respective developments, he was more in the role of an early adopter, pioneering the creative use of other people's inventions.
I don't want to diss the guy - apparently everyone, including people whose opinion I value, thinks he was a genius - I'm just saying that the encyclopedia.com quote is not "a better example". It is overboarding with undue praise and care has to be taken to stick to the facts in this article.
--BjKa (talk) 11:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chronology

edit

I find the chronology of this article to be confused, to say the least. Putting events in the right order might help to tighten it up and help it to make more sense. --Pinikadia 11:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Country vs Western

edit

The opening para identifies Paul as a "country" guitarist. Not so! Western - Just look at his guitar in 1950's videos...typical Western. For youngsters, there was a time when Western & Country were separate styles, and Paul unmistakedly belongs to the Western tradition. I propose to correct this, but I'll need to find good cite first -- suggestions, comments? — Preceding unsigned comment added by D Anthony Patriarche (talkcontribs) 21:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

List of instruments?

edit

This article would benefit from a chronological list of the guitars Les Paul, and Mary Ford, played. ——Design (talk) 03:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

pirate radio operator 1930s–1941

edit

Paul also had a pirate radio station, as Booger Brothers Broadcasting System, for some years, which led to his 1941 electrocution mentioned in the article. The sourcing is weak, seeming blog-like. This article seems to be edited by people more knowledgeable than me, so I'd rather someone else edited it. Nick Levinson (talk) 02:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Improve discography?

edit

Hello, the “Hit Singles” table in the current article would be improved if a column was added listing the artist(s). Some of the hit singles are by “Les Paul” and others by “Les Paul & Mary Ford”, for example. Design (talk) 11:44, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply