Talk:Aspropaxillus giganteus

(Redirected from Talk:Leucopaxillus giganteus)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleAspropaxillus giganteus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 29, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the giant leucopax mushroom has bioactive compounds with antioxidative, antibiotic, and anti-cancer properties?

What does this mean?

edit

Under the subheading "Description" this nonessential clause appears: "convex, when a margin that is rolled downwards, but as the mushrooms matures . . ." What is this clause supposed to mean? Ed8r (talk) 16:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note. I changed "initially" to "in younger specimens", does that clarify? Sasata (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leucopaxillus giganteus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply