Talk:Leung Chin-man appointment controversy

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeLeung Chin-man appointment controversy was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 13, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

GA fail

edit

Quick-fail, see Talk:Leung Chin-man appointment controversy/GA1 for details. Ling.Nut (talkWP:3IAR) 10:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Leung Chin-man appointment controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply